this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
2020 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

9582 readers
1897 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] myth96@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Pardon my ignorance, but would loading a forked version of android (like lineageOS or grapheneOS) get around this? I know graphene at least puts all Google services in its own container. Would that allow the rest of the system to run "side loaded" apps? Or is this unavoidable if you use any version based on android?

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yes. Those who already don't give a shit about google will be unaffected.

[–] myth96@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Cause at this point, I'm considering loading Ubuntu touch on here

[–] dai@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Larger issue at hand is the number of devices that are able to install / are currently supported by those projects.

Even something like unlocking a bootloader is a daunting task for an average someone who's even considering flashing a custom rom.

Considering regional variants of phones (looking at you Samsung) making this an even higher and more confusing task for the average someone.

The littering of tools for specific devices, requiring running on specific operating systems, the list goes on as far as hurdles to load a more open operating system on a phone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›