this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
2020 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

9575 readers
1455 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I can only hope the EU will set Google straight, the way they did Apple.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Considering:

A) You can still install any app you want beyond the Play Store (the rule is that developers need to get all their apps signed, and doesn't effect the end user technically)

And

B) Its most likely being done because of the EU, it's a part of the DSA (https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/digital-services-act_en). The "trader status", and other parts against illegal content)

The EU most like has already set them straight and this is the result.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Signed by who? Google? If so how does that not basically give them a monopoly on what can be installed?

And what about privacy? If somone wants to build an app to help whistleblowers, they have to expose themselves to a shady shitty mega Corp like Google?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If its such a security threat make it opt in for the users that want it. Idc about googles opinion on security I can handle that myself.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 13 points 2 months ago

That's literally what its like now. There's a scare message and a toggle

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not only we have basic right taken from us, the available software made by corporations is much buggier and less usable than ever. I am grateful that I am actually going away from tech/IT and pursuing other hobbies/interests, because I am less frustrated that way.

And I've decided to switch to Linux (Debian with KDE btw), because aside from its learning curve, it's much easier to manage than Windows installation.

[–] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The "reasonable case" is the law, and they will use it against you without mercy

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I am not sure if enhanced (and force-fed) security features are the main problems here. Monopolies, spying and not having easily accessible alternatives (easy from the perspective of a more average user) are the main problems. Because google and apple are monopolies, most security critical apps like banking apps (that you unfortunately need now a days) don't support alternative OSs which also feedbacks the monopoly. Otherwise I am fine if some people opt for a phone that is basically a locked black box for them so long as there are other alternatives (including those which are still super secure/locked but does not spy).

It is much more crazy to me that you have to fight your device so that it does not sneakily do something that you don't want it to do (like install AI out of the blue or use data for mapping your habits). And most average users won't give this fight and that is what these companies really count on.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›