this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
1962 points (99.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

9021 readers
2304 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nicerdicer@feddit.org 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] L7HM77@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This isn't a fight over security, or even the control to form a walled garden. This is to eliminate privacy, the ability to run anonymously written code. This forces every bit of code to be tied to a name and face. It shortens the legal legwork needed to pin down who made what, this will be used to eliminate anonymous groups compiling their own E2EE communication network. Time is important when your trying to use a compromised member of a group to make a honeypot trap.

ETA: Whoops, hit the wrong reply button

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 219 points 3 days ago (21 children)

Some of these comments are wild.

The OS should not at all stop me from doing what I want to do. Ever. Not even if that means I can fuck it up.

They can warn me when I attempt to do things that could fuck shit up. They can make it a bit harder to navigate to certain things so I'm less likely to fuck shit up. But it's my god damn hardware. I should be able to run and configure the software on it as I see fit.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 days ago (2 children)

But we subsidised the cost of your phone so we could make sweet sweet recurring revenue off your usage habits and targeted advertising!

You wouldn't want to take that away from us would you? Won't SOMEBODY think of the shareholders?!

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm getting really sick of products being only available subsidized by a level of invasiveness that should be illegal.

The government should need an individualized warrant to purchase my data. And honestly Google should need one to collect it

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The number of people I encounter, even on Lemmy, that genuinely believe and rigorously argue that being able to install or distribute software on devices you own is actually bad because “security” is beyond horrifying to me. They have been brainwashed into thinking that corporate monopolies are not only acceptable but desirable because you can completely and blindly trust Mom’s Old Fashioned Robot Oil to make all your decisions for you, for a modest fee and no opting out, of course.

This is why society is collapsing.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dude, I've been fighting this fight for over 10 years starting on reddit.

The amount of people, even supposedly?!? tech savy people that bootlick and excuse corporate behaviour is maddening. To the point makes you want to be conspiratorial and think they are saboteurs.

What I will never EVER understand is being loyal and "loving" a company. No matter if it's Apple, Samsung, Google they ARE NOT your friends. In fact they are the exact opposite and will make your life worse if it means they can squeeze an extra cent out of you.

[–] tomiant@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lately I've been thinking that what it is, is people trying to eliminate that overwhelming sense of existential dread which springs from all of this, by buying into it, just like fascists do- "if I join them they won't come for me". They start telling themselves that "maybe it's for the best", that "maybe good things will come of it", and once someone makes that jump it's easy for them to become zealous or fanatic, not only because it gives them an even greater sense of empowerment because they're now part of an ingroup or a club, but can also get off even more on perceived moral or intellectual supremacy over others.

These are extremely uncertain times, and uncertainty makes human scared and anxious, and scared anxious humans latch on to anything that gets them out of those feelings, in this case like surrendering before this gargantuan machine that they can neither understand nor control.

It's like with cultists. They crave the comfort of someone telling them what the truth is, to give them certainty. I don't know, something I thought about.

[–] L7HM77@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago

This isn't a fight over security, or even the control to form a walled garden. This is to eliminate privacy, the ability to run anonymously written code. This forces every bit of code to be tied to a name and face. It shortens the legal legwork needed to pin down who made what, this will be used to eliminate anonymous groups compiling their own E2EE communication network. Time is important when your trying to use a compromised member of a group to make a honeypot trap.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 186 points 4 days ago (4 children)

We really really need an open OS for mobile phones that is actually competitive with commercial offerings.

[–] troed@fedia.io 125 points 4 days ago (12 children)

I don't think the OS is the problem - it's that some of the critical service/apps people rely on (government ID, banking) only exist for the closed systems. Third party OS's try to "solve" it through various container approaches running the official apps, but since they see that as a security problem it's not something you can fully trust to be working at all times.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's the only reason I'm still on android. If I install a different OS I won't be able to login to do anything government related. I won't even be able to pay with my credit card online. I could get a physical code device from the government, but I'm not gonna lie, I really like the ease of access of having an app for that stuff, instead of a seperate device I have to have on me at all times.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 66 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They claim this is about security but when your system is compromised there is fuck all they will do to help you.

Fucking hypocritical, control-hungry pricks.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's about the security of their brand. No sane company wants people walking around, talking about shit their phone is because it keeps getting infected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They can piss off, there is no way I'm dowloading Google's ad ridden garbage apps of of their store. I'd rather stop using mobile phones alltogether

[–] tomiant@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

The worst part is, the vast majority of people will opt in by default, and when 99% of people do, that impetus will pull everything else in together with it. Us privacy and liberty minded fringe cases won't matter, because the tech will keep moving in whatever direction is dictated by the giants because they will have ensnared the global population in their schemes, and it will pull us along with the drift.

It's pretty god damned bleak. We need to seriously organize and coordinate resistance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 103 points 3 days ago (13 children)

You know, it's true - I have never heard a Linux user refer to something as sideloading, even though Linux is the platform that originated official software repositories.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The key thing to understand is that there's a big fucking difference between a "repository" and an "app store." One is designed for the convenience of users; the other is designed to exploit them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 102 points 3 days ago (6 children)

My feed is curated by the Illuminati

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago

I had to 'sideload' the secret of mana port because play store would refuse to validate the license offline after purchase. If I can't play offline a single player game that i bought, than what should i do.

I also have an apk of wayward souls, because it was removed from the store and i like that game. Also a premium game. So yes. Running software as i see fit.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I can only hope the EU will set Google straight, the way they did Apple.

[–] tomiant@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The EU will, at some point, cave to the interest of global capital. I am proud that they have fought as well as they have these past few decades, but as long as capitalism rules the planet, capital will always supersede rule of law and democracy in the end.

America is about to, if it has not already, succumb completely to that state of affairs, and once that power is consolidated by the capital, EU will be (one of) the next targets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 57 points 3 days ago (3 children)

nudging the EU with a stick Come on, do something

[–] Vikthor@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Plot twist: EU enacts Chat Control.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If I ever go insane and write a manifesto this will be on it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EldenLord@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I finally want to switch to android and boom: Custom ROMs and "sideloading" gets swept off the platter. Well ok I guess I‘ll just wait for a good linux mobile OS

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not only we have basic right taken from us, the available software made by corporations is much buggier and less usable than ever. I am grateful that I am actually going away from tech/IT and pursuing other hobbies/interests, because I am less frustrated that way.

And I've decided to switch to Linux (Debian with KDE btw), because aside from its learning curve, it's much easier to manage than Windows installation.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If its such a security threat make it opt in for the users that want it. Idc about googles opinion on security I can handle that myself.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 13 points 3 days ago

That's literally what its like now. There's a scare message and a toggle

load more comments
view more: next ›