this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
736 points (92.6% liked)

Political Memes

9293 readers
1775 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Glad they're taking off the gloves a little, but it's always been a non-option to just make our lives significantly and irrevocably better like M4A or the PRO act and although they're good at trying and failing, they never talk about the consequences as dire as they actually are with few exceptions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

US politics is literally Kafkaesque. You have an opposition party who refuse to be an opposition party.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Not really... it's just your garden variety corruption. They're both owned by the same ultra-wealthy corporations and individuals, so of course they're both doing the bidding of their owners.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 106 points 3 days ago (15 children)

What, are you going to vote for the guy who will put his knee on your throat and murder you? No, of course not. You should vote for not that, because not that will not do that and if someone else does, they will glare disapprovingly from a safe distance, secretly appreciating that it isn't them being murdered.

Democrats. We're not actively evil.

[–] FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 days ago

Simpsons in 1994:

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats. We're not actively evil.

That's an inspiring bumper sticker. NOT.

Unfortunately, it seems to be the entire Democratic strategy since 2000.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Goes way back before that. Carter was unable to get the DNC leadership support for budgets or reforms. And Carter was barely left of center. In fact, Ted Kennedy challenged him for the presidential nomination in 1980, with Kennnedy running as a more liberal candidate. Kennedy lost, of course, and then Carter lost to Reagan.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If it gets really bad, Chuck Schumer will write a stern letter and Cory Booker will, like... stand in one spot for a long time talking about stuff.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (27 children)

And yet, if I have a choice to be policed by Chauvin or Thao, there is no question that I choose Thao.

Yes, the ultimate goal is to deprive both of these men of their power. But for that to happen we need Chauvin to take his knee off our neck.

~~This is barely a metaphor by the way. Since Trump pardoned Chauvin and the Democrats didn’t.~~ Evidently I must have been thinking of another pardon.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know we need to destroy the power of both

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Of course. And my belief is that neither voting nor abstaining from voting for anyone is going to achieve that.

However, it may make the task easier or harder.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

yeah the other option is revolution, and with that it's still not guaranteed you end up with what you want when the dust settles. Good chance China or Russia will take advantage and jump in and fill the power vacuum in the US when civil war happens.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

There's another real possibility.

History seems to be repeating itself. Right now the U.S. is in the "Germany in 1933" phase. If we don't deal with the situation ourselves then it's possible that a coalition of other countries could do the job for us, in which case "innocent" Americans will be nothing more than collateral damage.

Who knows how much the world's Nuclear arsenal will change the situation, but if any regime in the last 100 years is stupid and pig headed enough to try and win a thermonuclear war.... that's possibly why he says so many stupid and out of pocket things- to convince people that is definitely an option.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No you need the guy with the camera to set it down and throw a fucking Molotov.

Become ungovernable. We already live in a police state.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Becoming ungovernable is not incompatible with voting though. And again, will be easier without a knee on your neck.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Mjpasta710@midwest.social 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

trump hasn't pardoned chauvin from my research as a note.

He's garbage and his entire administration is collectively like Darth Vader huffing spray paint.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except they are actively evil they don't just ignore Republican actions it wasn't like Biden was looking the other way when murder by police officers was reaching record highs and Israel was commiting a genocide with his support or Obama was looking the other way when millions are violently deported and many others blown up at weddings by drone strikes. They commit plenty of active evil themselves.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] lightnegative@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The real travesty is you only have 2 options, they're both not very good and the entire country is polarized around one or the other.

I think the Europeans were on to something with MMP. My country adopted it in the 90's and finally ~30 years later we have a 3 party government (previous max was 2).

It helps with preventing one party gaining absolute power and also gives citizens more realistic options at the polling booth

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Took me a minute to get the context of what I was looking at. I was going to ask what the LEO on the left side was doing.... Then.... Yeah. I don't even know that motherfuckers name. I also don't care to. Fuck him.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Good. I hope he gets the Epstein treatment.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's quite literally worse. Chauvin faced consequences.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

only after world wide pressure, most don’t get that

[–] ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bernie is the one with the camera.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 11 points 2 days ago

Which makes all of us George Floyd.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What I always appreciate about this meme is that they picked Tou Thao to represent the Dem platform to Chauvin's Republican. Thao famously denied any wrongdoing up to sentencing and described himself as a human traffic cone. As a result, he got a worse sentence than even other officers who put hands on Mr. Floyd(though not as bad as Chauvin of course). It really gives it layers.

load more comments
view more: next ›