1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
It doesn't now, but I'd be willing to add that to Tesseract. Seems easy enough to implement.
Edit: It's not fully plumbed in yet, but the settings to configure it have been added to the filter policy framework. Will probably also do a similar setting for comments. Shown enabled here, but disabled by default, naturally.
Edit 2: Plumbed in and working now in the dev build. Can also completely hide those, but that doesn't exactly work for a screenshot.
Very nice!
I wouldn't mind if it's opt-in.
I certainly don't want the average internet user having any more control over what I see than they unfortunately already have.
Oh yeah. It would be fully optional and user configurable ideally. On Reddit you could enter any number you wanted. I usually kept mine set on -2 back in the day
I requested this (user configurable threshold options added) on Boost a few months ago, don't know if it's going to be put in.
Why is this idea down voted?
A good number of Lemmy users seem to not understand the value of the voting system. Perhaps over a fear of brigading. I don't know, makes zero sense to me
I think hiding that posts should not be the default. Maybe the moderator could get notified if the posts surpases the threshold and perhaps some sort of indicator for the posts so that clients can manage them to preference(hide or give a warning).
I agree, that does seem like a useful feature, though I hadn't thought of it before. Thanks for sharing the idea, hopefully someone important noticed.
Pretty sure that's a thing on piefed
By low quality do you mean any unpopular opinions ?
I mean like when people post pseudoscience to a science community or something that's completely off topic. Or maybe a poor stick figure being submitted to an art community. The community voting filter is integral, and if you don't like it you should just use Mastodon rather than Lemmy
Is every unpopular opinions about something serious as giving psuedoscience trash?
Denying scientific science or saying uncientific science is not opinions it's objectively false claims
If you don't vibe with what's popular in your community, maybe you should find a different community. That's the beauty of the fediverse
That's whst we call trying to create echo chambers. I don't want that
