I guarantee that even if they don’t find anything, they’ll find something.
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
301 points (99.3% liked)
politics
25335 readers
2489 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
We’re getting closer to the night of the long knives
Damn, that's crazy. How about them EPSTEIN FILES tho.
I wonder if the people doing the raiding ever think "hey wait a minute... What's to stop them from doing this to me in the future"
They never think that. I promise you.
They never think.
as long as they see more lgbtq and brown people getting it first, then they'll have "won" in their minds
The raid is part of a “national security investigation in search of classified records,” a person familiar with the matter told NBC News.
FBI Director Kash Patel tweeted “NO ONE is above the law… @FBI agents on mission” at around 7 a.m. ET, the same time his agents reportedly arrived at Bolton’s home in Bethesda, near Washington, D.C.
Then if someone were to be caught with classified records in the bathrooms and poolside storage rooms at Mar a Lago, they'd be facing some serious legal consequences, right? No one is above the law, right, Kash?
That's not what they're looking for...
The only reason they'd raid Bolton is if they thought he might be holding onto an "insurance policy", likely Epstein related.
I think a lot of people who worked around the Epstein shit is gonna start getting raided.
They want to release their doctored version, and they're trying to make sure no one has what they've redacted before they release it.
Logically, there aren't many other reasons for this...
Remove tinfoil before opening mouth.
This is much simpler: Bolton opposed Trump, therefore he is an enemy of Trump, therefore an enemy of the state, therefore a legitimate target for harassment through law enforcement. Same way if in Russia someone opposes Putin he will have goons come after him. It all discourages any kind of opposition, because most opponents will go away if you just trash their house or beat them up a bit.
Exactly. This was sending a message, not to Democrats, but to Traditional Republicans who might be considering opposing the MAGA takeover. There is no Republican Party, it's the MAGA PARTY now, so get on board, or else!
It's right out of the autocracy handbook. The orange is intimidating and soon getting rid of his opposition one raid at a time. And every raid sends a clear message to his enemies and allies: "Do not oppose the Czar."
You think as much as trump is freaking out about Epstein...
That he's just going after random people who aren't actively causing him problems?
He's simple minded, and there's a lot of pressure to release more info. If he releases something, and says it's everything, anyone that might have retained information from prior to Joe Biden's presidency is a threat.
Bolton could have literal.proof about what the government had prior to Biden, saying that's the likely motivation isn't "tinfoil" it's Occam's razor.
- What makes you think John Bolton would have anything Epstein-related?
- What about the many, many other individuals Trump has targeted with the DoJ and other branches of government? Do they all have an Epstein-related "insurance policy" as well?
- What makes you think Trump is "freaking out" about Epstein? He has said several things disapproving of the intense interest in Epstein, but that's not enough to make me think that any time he abuses the government to target his opponents it must be because of that.
This is like all conspiracy theories: you've got a pet idea that would be exciting if it were true and so you're minded to ignore any alternative explanations for the facts.
If he releases something, and says it’s everything, anyone that might have retained information from prior to Joe Biden’s presidency is a threat.
What's to prevent him from saying they've fabricated it?
-
Because ever since Kissinger the national security advisor has been the conduit between the president and intelligence agencies. And Bolton was in that position when the FBI opened the safe at Epstein's place. The one filled with video and electronic files that somehow "disappeared".
-
If I said a rectangle was a square, would you say that's only possible if every rectangle was a square?
-
Reality...
Now, one question for you:
- What about America in 2025 makes you write off every conspiracy as fake? You know there are real life co spiracies every fucking day? Are you expecting people to just give trump the benefit of the fucking doubt that he wouldn't pull a conspiracy? It hasn't even been five years since he fucking cnspired to overthrow the USA government resulting in a real life insurrection. But this is too out of pocket for you? You can't imagine Trump's administration would do that?
Come the fuck on...
If you don't understand still, nothing else I ever say will help you. Best of luck.
Because ever since Kissinger the national security advisor has been the conduit between the president and intelligence agencies. And Bolton was in that position when the FBI opened the safe at Epstein’s place.
The "conduit"? Correct me if I'm wrong but the National Security Advisor isn't out kicking in doors when the FBI go on raids. The FBI is not an intelligence agency (it has an intelligence branch) and being the "conduit" doesn't mean he has the ability, inclination, foresight or skullduggery to gather such "insurance policies."
If I said a rectangle was a square, would you say that’s only possible if every rectangle was a square?
If you said that on a specific day the sun rose because you had prayed really hard for it to pray the previous day, I would be asking you what about all the other days when it rose without your apparent intervention.
Reality…
Not good enough.
What about America in 2025 makes you write off every conspiracy as fake?
I'm calling out your conspiracy theory thinking. Target John Bolton with an FBI investigation is a conspiracy, is a fascist abuse of power and is not, in any way, giving Trump "the benefit of the doubt." But it's not conspiracy theory thinking, because there's no super secret bullshit that only a select few are smart enough to work out - it's the regular kind of secret stuff that we can infer based on facts and evidence.
To believe your story I have to believe that there's a high chance John Bolton has "the Epstein list" and has kept it as insurance. You have given me no reason to believe this except that Bolton was head of - not the FBI, not the DoJ, but the National Security Council. So what? On the basis of such weak evidence you'd be saying that thousands of government officials have Epstein related "insurance".
You're not, though, because you're not actually basing this on any thought process which takes evidence into account.
Yes
What would Bolton have had to do with the Epstein materials? He was National Security Advisor.
Epstein being Mossad would be national security related
Some of you have gone off the deep end.
With this administration, anything is possible.
I think what he's saying is that the simpler explanation is that Trump hates people not sucking his dick and regurgitating his bullshit statements. Bolton has been doing the rounds and not following the trump line. So now trump hates him, which means the regime hates him.
More than one thing can be true at the same time.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Rules for thee
I heard this on the radio this morning and could have sworn they called him Michael Bolton and could not tell if they were doing an office space bit.
Ya know, I love his music.
I celebrate his entire catalog.
John Bolton goes on a lot of shows, YouTube shows, and podcasts criticizing trump. They’re going after critics now…
I think we need to call it what it is now - a purge.
Purges can be both violent and nonviolent. I'd argue that the Trump administration is purging through deportations, litigation, and now raids against detractors. Likely, this style of purging will only escalate towards more violence through the legal system until it reaches an explosive, physically violent moment. We're not even a year into his term...
We've seen this all before. History doesn't repeat, but it often rhymes.
Bolton is a massive piece of shit and he deserves to be eaten by the monster he helped create. That said, this is still wrong. Prosecuting critics is not an acceptable fascist escalation just because the target is a fascist. If John Bolton doesn't have rights, then neither do you.
"I will decide who is a Jew!"
- Hermann Göring
"No-one is above the law" is blatantly untrue though isnt it?
Temporarily. Death comes for us all. Universal law.
Weaponization of law enforcement isn't on any fascism checklist, is it?
Bolton turned against trump.
Cash Patel and Bongino are protecting trump.
EPSTEIN
EPSTEIN
EPSTEIN
Man
Trump's purges of former political allies turned enemies is boring as fuck. Like shit, Heritage Foundation might be the influencers of Nazis, but they certainly are worse than Nazis in every meaning of the word.
If he's going to screw us all at least give us a show or get us off you know?
Don’t forget the Federalist Society and their decades long campaign to groom law students to be placed in the Supreme Court
These aren't FBI agents, these are newly recruited thugs and sycophants abusing their power. Patel is going to do a number of these things to various people Trump doesn't like and find nothing, OR they'll start dropping manufactured evidence and try to keep people in custody.
Point is, this is ramping up fast, and it's finally here. If it only stays as an intimidating tactic to shut people up, that would be shocking. I expect planted evidences, and the whole shebang before a judge stops this. They're probably getting warrants from Aileen Cannon or some bullshit.
Planted evidences? Yeah most likely, also probably will be something small and unrelated to the case but enough for a judge to glue it together with a hefty sentence.
(Simplified example: weed on the premises -> supporting drug trafficking -> supporting violent gangs -> danger to the usa)
Heck, his book alone might be construed as anti trump, anti presidential so therefore anti USA and dangerous.
A judge stopping it? Nah, none of them will, and if one might think it's ridiculous enough to pull on the brake he or she will be overruled by an appeals court.
The law is Trump and trump is the law.
(so hey, if he IS the law he can never be above it ... nor below...)
It's ILLEGAL to Take Home Classified Documents?
Not if you store them by the shitter at your gaudy estate where foreign agents can roam free at the cost of a $100K membership.
Checkmate, libtard.
So bolton clearly has a copy of the Epstein list
came to say this.
John Bolton is a staunch imperialist who should've been in jail for his role in bush era war crimes and corruption. He collaborated with the first trump regime then had the gall to complain that their actions may not have been entirely above-board.
If he ends up in jail for running afoul of his ideological proteges it would be as close to poetic justice as we get under fascism.
This, exactly. When he accepted the role of trump’s UN envoy to (in his mind) further his idiot evillrey, I said “remember John, anybody who supports trump will get shit on. No exceptions.”
Little late, but sure.
I just hope this leads to us finding out what he looks like under the ridiculous fake glasses, nose, and mustache.
Okay, the glasses might be real, I'm not entirely sure on that one.