this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
263 points (96.1% liked)

Science Memes

16371 readers
2668 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

whales are fish because they successfully went back to the ocean and i'm jealous

[–] azi@mander.xyz 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Broke: Whales are fish because they look like other fish

Woke: Whales aren't fish because they're in the class Mammalia, not Pisces

Bespoke: Whales are fish any monophyletic group that encompasses all the fishes must also include the clade Tetrapoda

Artichoke: Whales aren't fish because fishes are a paraphyletic group that includes the entire clade Vertebrata at the exclusion of the clade Tetrapoda.

Stick and Poke: Whales are fish because they've developed the same bodyplan and are in the same ecological niche as the pelagic fishes.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Ah that's the spirit!!!!

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Whales aren’t fish, they’re whales. There is no such thing as a fish.

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Whaddayamean there's no such thing as a fish? I just ate one!

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 2 points 8 hours ago

I'm a fish, you're a fish, OP is a fish, are there any other fish I should know about?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I don’t know how many times I have to say this, I AM NOT A FISH! I am a regular tasty human, and frankly I’m growing real tired of these targeted attacks. You people are ridiculous. I won’t swi-STAND! Y-we stand. I won’t stand for this!

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Guys I think this guy might be a fish

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Guys, I think this guy might be a HUGE JERK FACE!

[–] count_duckula@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Dunno mate, seems like a dragon to me.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

A dragon with a jerk for a face.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No that guy's Canadian I think

[–] Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

STOP TELLING PEOPLE I’M A FISH!!!

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 25 points 21 hours ago (1 children)


or something, I'm not a biologist

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Continuing a long proud tradition of "midwit" memes being made exclusively by people who think they're the 145 IQ guy, but are actually the the 55 IQ guy who found a brown hood.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 20 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 14 hours ago

Yes but only when culinary, this is why it's okay for vegans to eat whale.

[–] Mist101@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

This tracks, berries keep their seeds on the inside. Whales are bananas and vice versa.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Whales are mammals. How is the dude on the right even being pedantic and not just outright dumb?

[–] chaos@beehaw.org 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There isn't a simple evolutionary definition of "fish", not the same way there is for, say, mammals. If you found the common ancestor of everything we call a mammal and said "everything descended from this one is also a mammal", you'd be correct. If you did that for everything we call fish, every animal in the world would be a fish. Also, we decided which animals were fish mostly on vibes, so without a clear definition you can pedantically argue that everything is a fish including mammals.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That's not quite true. A lot of worms, for example, wouldn't be fish, but all fish would be worms. Most invertebrates also wouldn't be fish.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't that only if they are born between February 19th and March 20th? 🤔

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 13 hours ago

Those are fishies.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Cladistically speaking, whales are just a big colony of eukaryotic clones.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I know a doctor of marine biology who disagrees with your assessment.

Everyone that doesn't revel in their fishness is a coward or worse, a creationist.

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 7 hours ago

I don't know how anyone could read Moby Dick and not come away convinced of their obvious fishness. Surely one's nature and behavior are more important than one's reproductive organs.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 41 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I think a more nuanced answer is better: "Only if you believe mammals and fish are not mutually exclusive."

[–] tyler@programming.dev 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the even more nuanced answer is that “fish” is not a scientific category so comparing it to mammals makes no sense.

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Got it , got it... writes in margin

Ichthyology ≠ Science

[–] tyler@programming.dev 12 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish

In a break from the long tradition of grouping all fish into a single class (''Pisces''), modern phylogenetics views fish as a paraphyletic group.

Paraphyly is a taxonomic term describing a grouping that consists of the grouping's last common ancestor and some but not all of its descendant lineages. The grouping is said to be paraphyletic with respect to the excluded subgroups. In contrast, a monophyletic grouping (a clade) includes a common ancestor and all of its descendants.

This is in contrast to the class Mammalia which is a complete clade.

In other words, I could make up a branch of science called foobarthology that studies Jurassic raptors, whales, and the Rock Dove, but that doesn’t mean those things are related, or a ‘true’ scientific group of their own. It just means I put them together for some other reason, either cause it’s easier for the requirements of the job, or I wanted to, or many other reasons including historical.

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

"Scientific group" is not the applicable term. "natural group" or "monophyletic group" or "clade", would be more... scientific

[–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 11 hours ago

Sure, and not calling them fish is even more scientific. From a grouping perspective, (which is how you refer to it) there is no such group.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@piefed.social 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Look all I'm saying is Hank Green agrees with me that whales are fish.

https://youtu.be/-C3lR3pczjo

[–] teft@piefed.social 7 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Hank Green is great but good god the adhd runs strong in that one. Watch some of his vlogbrothers videos and count the number of cuts. It's like watching Liam Neeson jump a fence.

Maybe that's why I like him so much lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 9 points 21 hours ago

You can't fool me. I've read Moby Dick and Melville dedicated an entire chapter about how whales are absolutely fish

load more comments
view more: next ›