this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
80 points (87.7% liked)

Technology

34832 readers
1 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey everyone. I made a casual survey to see if people can tell the difference between human-made and AI generated art. Any responses would be appreciated, I'm curious to see how accurately people can tell the difference (especially those familiar with AI image generation)

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Got 9/20.

That was a good selection of images, quite tricky.

I'm proud of getting both the LEGO minifig ones correct.

[–] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Another 9/20er here. I did feel like I was guessing a lot, it was almost satisfying to get such a midway score.

[–] cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I also got 9/20, feeling certain about only a handful, and completely thrown off by others. Since all questions were yes/no, expected score would be 10/20, so my score correctly reflects that I had no real idea what was AI-generated or not. I expect the average score to be close to 10/20, skewed somewhat higher by those who might have a keen eye for some telltale signs of AI-trickery.

[–] Noved@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The one that got me was definitely the fruits, I didn't realize that AI was able to generate decent text yet lol

[–] popcar2@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

DALL-E 3 is the only model that gets text right. It usually yields consistent results but can still jumble on words if you ask it to say too much. It's a big step forward regardless.

AI generated photo of a cat saying "I'm king of the world!"

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

That's incredible. I'm usually surprised when there's a single correct word.

[–] astanix@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Well I got less than 50%, maybe I'm an AI. What is even real anymore!?

[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

12/20, most of my mistakes were in saying human-made work was AI generated.

[–] Cwiiis@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

10/20 but I'm a little annoyed that what looks exactly like a panel from Berserk is apparently AI generated... Feels like the training data might just be replicated in entirety there, either that or someone asked it to generate "Guts from Berserk" 😛

[–] reflex_aliens@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

3/20. I almost got everything perfectly backwards!

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Cool test, thanks for putting this together! I got 8/20 - this essentially proved to me that for many cases, AI generation is not really distinguishable anymore.

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago

10/20, got tricked by the horse in one of them, it looked really messed up, like something AI would make.

I guess the artist cant make horses

[–] ar0177417@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Zeragamba@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

same score here

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

I got real life ones correct, almost all paintings too (10 was tricky) but charcoal drawings are kinda impossible to guess.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Detail plays a huge role in determining AI, and many of the pictures appear compressed which makes that criterion… difficult to consider. I’m not surprised that I got half right, regardless. The man on the bench really got me, why is his ankle thread-thin?

[–] Traegs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I got 12/20 and most of the ones I got wrong are the ones I was second guessing myself on.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

12/20, these new systems are way too good at what they do. With drawings it's basically impossible to tell unless there are obvious mistakes. And the mugshots are spot on too.

[–] hulemy@ani.social 3 points 2 years ago

9/20 damnit, thought I'd be better at this

[–] PrimalHero@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

6/20 I am bad at this

[–] crowfx@crowfx.web.id 3 points 2 years ago

Got 7/20.

Those images are actually hard to distinguish for me. An eye opening experience.

[–] ArtyTester@artemis.camp 3 points 2 years ago

I got all the “real life” pictures correct, but most of the drawings and paintings were in line with straight guessing.

There are things that stick out as “wrong” on a picture of life, but in a drawing or paining the question is “is this wrong or just what the artist decided to do?”

[–] virku@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Question 11 didn't have a correct answer.

[–] popcar2@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fixed, thanks for reporting.

[–] rbn@feddit.ch 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Questions 11, 12, and 20 we're all graded incorrectly as the correct answer contradicts the specified source.

Based on the automatic grading I got 12 out of 20. Based on the feedback / comments I got 15 correct.

I'm quite proud that within the human photographies I classified 100% correct but I guess it'll be impossible for me if the algorithms just improve a tiny little bit.

[–] popcar2@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

They were fixed after posting but that may be after you opened the link, answers should be good now.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

7/20 I think I'm supposed to seppuku or whatever now

[–] ma11en@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] FiniteLooper@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

11/20, I’m surprised. I thought I would do better at seeing that standard AI look and feel, but those other art aunties really threw me off. I wasn’t aware some of them could be generated from an AI so well!

[–] apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

AI generated photographs, or I guess AI generated images that are trying to appear photoreal are usually pretty easy to spot.

The stylized artistic ones are often really hard because you could have a human work of art that is trying to purposefully mimic an AI generator, which looks like the case with Strawberry Taiyaki Cat

[–] southernwolf@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

14/20, nicely done! I will say, I maybe would have wanted to see more AI results than just from Dall-e 3, though given I still missed 6 of the, that speaks very highly of Dall-e 3's capabilities. But some midjourney and SDXL images would have made for a wider guessing selection too.

[–] MellowBright@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I agree. I've only been using Stable Diffusion so I was surprised to see it's lack of presence. I feel like half to ones I got wrong were because I'm too used to SD's quirks.

Dall-e has apparently gotten really damn good lately. The talking fruit in particular. Being context aware enough to create accurate speech bubbles is crazy neat. One huge step closer to AI comic books.

[–] HipPriest@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

8/20 here. Proud of getting some right. Really shocked about the answers to some!

A tricky test indeed

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

The link doesn't work.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

Well, I did alright on the people, but I got almost all of the landscapes incorrect. I'll also admit to guessing on a number of them; if I had to explain exactly what I was basing my answer on for ones I said were AI, I'd have missed 2 more, because I just couldn't see anything that looked off, it was just a hunch.

[–] Danar@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Questions 12 and 20 seem to have incorrect answers. The correct answer is "no", but the comment says they were created by DALLE-3

[–] popcar2@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Fixed both right before seeing this comment, I'm really not awake enough for this :P

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

11/20

I have used SD so I can see some of the ai tell tale signs but haven't used Dall-E at all.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] NaturalViber@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I got 14/20. I am the real human that has gotten the high score. I am not a bot. Real human only.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

14/20

Cool survey.

Some of the similar ones i got the wrong way around, but i was quite happy with my answers for others where i was quite confident there were (to me) obvious indicators of AI and got them right.

[–] RocketBucket@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

15/20 - Nice survey, was quite tricky