this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
910 points (99.7% liked)

196

4327 readers
2147 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: https://infosec.exchange/users/isotopp/statuses/115059833470035521

TranscriptAge Verification

Due to applicable UK laws, websites must verify the age of visitors using official ID to confirm they are at least 18 years old. We are a small site and unfortunately do not have the resources to implement such a system, so we are unable to serve users in the UK.

We are not required to verify your location, so please confirm below:

[I am not in the UK] [I am in the UK]

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 268 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Frankly this is a comically brilliant and absolutely outstanding example of engineering malicious compliance

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 96 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Sadly, will not actually be sufficient. They put the full burden of this shit on the site owner, all of it, without exception.

You could host in a country like Cameroon, they won't give a shit and EU won't bother going after them. They could geoblock the whole country however.

[–] NoPanko@feddit.uk 61 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Meh you just say “we don’t serve users from your country, we are not bound by your laws. users from the UK are breaking our tos”

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This already happens occasionally with the EU's GDPR.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MagicianWithABadPlan@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's pretty sufficient. I'm not British, I don't sell products in Britain, I do not have British assets, and I'm compliant with all American laws. They can levy all of the fines they want but I'm not obligated to care.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

unless you ever want to visit the UK

of course if you don’t ever want to, that’s fine… or if you’re small enough to fly under the radar

but just because you have no presence doesn’t mean you’ll never have any presence

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They could geoblock the whole country however.

The Great Firewall of TERF Island

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

we can compromise and just firewall jk rowlings house

[–] UnpledgedCatnapTipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would the firewall replace her mold wall?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hoimo@ani.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

UK left the EU, so the EU won't be doing anything regardless of your host country.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 150 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

physically im in the uk mentally im literally anywhere else

[–] Kittyroll@anarchist.nexus 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

even australia? or germany?

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i'm not sure australia is a real place tbh

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're confusing it with New Zealand, which is clearly made up.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Agreed, they are confused.

Australia is where the spiders and kangaroos are.

New Zealand is where the hobbits are from, clearly imaginary.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

australia also has robert irwin which is the only good thing to come from there.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

hey now bluey is great

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MalReynolds@piefed.social 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nah, oz is cooked already, in this case 'social media ban' for under 16s, same identity/privacy issues no doubt once they get their shit together but this time you're giving ID to meta and tiktok instead of pornhub, significantly worse IMO. Germany's going after adblockers. Shit's bad out there...

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 78 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

UK has been on a killing small businesses streak since Brexit

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

That's because the UK is no longer a nation of shopkeepers. It is a nation of serfs for US corporations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 58 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This isn’t considered verification in the UK from what I can tell. Companies are now implementing AI face scans, ID checks and credit card verification to comply with the UK law. I’m not a lawyer or even British, but it wouldn’t make sense to me that companies would spend money to turn away their UK customers otherwise.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How are they checking that your website’s face scans are actually ‘working’ and not just passing everyone?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Also what stops someone just getting OBS virtual webcam and just feed it stock video of some old geezer...?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They make you do things like open your mouth and smile

You'd have to use a video game... Which people are doing

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

New business idea, renting out your face via video feed to let people bypass age checks.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have an idea. Cardboard cutout masks.

[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 17 points 2 weeks ago

That's never going to pass for a real person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fergie434@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Enter your birthdate:

01/01/1970

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] schema@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I recently looked through the requirements on Ofcom's website, and to me it sounded like every email service falls well into their "user to user communication" category, which would have to "assess the risks". It's not really different than communicating in an internet forum, except it's not public, but that's not really a factor i think. Sending porn via email is probably as old as email itself.

Email providers cant moderate their users' mails (i mean they could try, but that would likely be the end of them for the obvious breach in privacy). And having people have to age-verify for an email account would be ludicrous, especially considering children need emails for school, etc.

I wonder if they ever clarified anything about email services and how they would or would not be affected by this bullshit law.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You can get porn in a google image search, even in the UK. No ID or login required. I did see a comment about it not applying to search engines, which really does make you wonder what is the fucking point!!

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tracking and spying on the population.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

So a company can collect copies of everyone's ID cards.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 18 points 2 weeks ago

Door to door mail could be considered user to user too. Oh wait, I shouldn't give them ideas.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder if they ever clarified anything

No

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If they have no infrastructure or legal presence in the UK they are not required to do shit. The UK can block them but that's about it.

The UK does not have extraterritorial jurisdiction! Whatever stupid shit they do on their shitty little island does not affect foreign firms that do not operate there.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

kinda… if you never plan on visiting the UK or any country with extradition agreements with the UK, sure… not sure exactly how extradition works, but if you ever come to a country and have big fines etc pending then they can do whatever they want

if you were like.. the CEO of reddit or something, and just chose to forgo ad revenue etc from the UK but still remain operational, i’m pretty sure they’d be able to get you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Based small business

[–] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 17 points 2 weeks ago

Clever girl

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago
[–] MagicianWithABadPlan@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Bandaid to a gunshot wound.

The answer is to make all those politicians (and that person who wanted to profit off from facial recognition) defending this law to regret even existing.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

You're not supossed to capitalise it iirc.

Please post this to r/Unitedkingdom.

[–] Una@europe.pub 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sometimes :3

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ironically, you can just lie to get past it.

load more comments
view more: next ›