this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
284 points (94.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

26121 readers
1024 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] janAkali@lemmy.sdf.org 151 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Vibecoding:

  • go to chatgpt
  • ask it to make an app
  • ask it to fix errors (ad infinitum)
  • ???
  • sell app (optional)
  • get sued and ruin your reputation (hopefully)
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

The ??? isn’t a reference to underpants gnomes. It’s just that no one has ever gotten LLMs to actually fix its own bugs to find out what that step is

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 100 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It’s using AI to ruin your codebase and build technical debt.

I think it is very funny and fully support companies doing this to themselves.

[–] midori@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The Microsoft way. gestures at the last several patch Tuesdays

[–] wischi@programming.dev 23 points 2 weeks ago

I think the most hilarious thing was their public Copilot demonstration working on the .NET source code. They basically showed the world that copilot isn't ready for serious work.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It were they that have been bragging that more than 50% of their code was written by AI, weren't?

Anyway, that's counted by lines of code, not in number of mini-vans. They can still use a better statistic.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

are... you having a stroke? Blink twice if you need an ambo.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Kids this days won't even get a dated reference...

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 74 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I honestly thought vibe coding was a joke until someone posted a video about it and then realized people were serious.

It's basically the equivalent to your friend who has a brilliant idea for an app and just needs you to do the coding for it - without having any clue how IT actually works.

[–] czardestructo@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought it was a joke until someone at my company gave a company wide presentation on how to use AI to accelerate coding and st several points flat out ADMITTED he didn't know what the hell it was doing but you just need to 'baby sit' it and you get useful scripts out of it. I'm a hardware engineer and I wanted to scream at him.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not just for coding either. Yesterday, my senior director used Google's AI to ask about the architecture to integrate one of our vendor products with our ERP system (usually my job). Fortunately the AI did me a solid and said "This is a highly complex integration 🤯".

Yeah... No shit, that's why so many of us are employed. Shit's complicated.

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's exactly the reason why companies what to use AI. They don't want to employ.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 9 points 2 weeks ago

Now, your friend with the birlliant idea doesn't need you anymore and can ask a chatbot to make his brilliant app all by himself!

That is definitely a great benefit of vibe coding: it's an idiot magnet and frees up our brainspace.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 54 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

imagine your mom using an llm to write an app...

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 weeks ago

It's going to an llm and typing in the text box "make me an app that does X" then patting yourself on the back for "coding".

[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Prompt an LLM to write a bit of code that does something. Do this 9000 times until it spits out something that vaguely accomplishes this task. You can't push any of the fever dream nonsense it created into the main branch until you check it thoroughly. In the end you spend more time with this process than you would have if you'd just written it yourself.

The C suite and the board members continue jerking each other off as they call this "efficiency."

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 35 points 2 weeks ago

Original definition: using AI to create a small bespoke kinda-crap-but-it-works apps or games for personal use. It's a shitty proto but it's interesting.

(My reaction: ooo not my jam but that sounds neat I guess)

Modern definition: it's a multi-quadrispillion dollar industry and it's the future according to some very important board members.

(My reaction: ...capitalism ruins fucking everything)

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Neither do vibe coders.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Have you tried asking Copilot what it is?

[–] Konstant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

"Vibe coding" is an informal term, mostly used in online programming communities, that refers to writing code in a relaxed, intuitive, or improvisational way rather than following a strict plan or methodology.

It’s often associated with:

Experimentation → typing out ideas, running them quickly, and adjusting on the fly.

Flow state → coding while listening to music, late at night, or just for fun without rigid structure.

Prioritizing creativity over rules → not worrying too much about best practices, efficiency, or readability at first—just "feeling out" the solution.

Playfulness → sometimes it means coding with minimal context, like making something cool without knowing exactly how it’ll end up.

Some people use “vibe coding” positively (as in getting into the zone and letting intuition guide you), while others use it humorously or critically (as in writing spaghetti code without much forethought).

Would you like me to give you some examples of how vibe coding looks in practice—like snippets that show the contrast between "structured coding" vs. "vibe coding"?

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh is that what it is...

* awkwardly zips up pants *

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

vibe coding is very dirty.

[–] dbx12@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wikipedia defines it as

Advocates of vibe coding say that it allows even amateur programmers to produce software without the extensive training and skills required for software engineering.

Now if you replace some words you see how absolutely bonkers the idea in general is:

Advocates of aircraft autopilots say that it allows even amateur pilots to fly large airplanes without the extensive training and skills required for commercial pilots.

[–] Stitch0815@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Mhhhh Yes and no

Should vibe coding be used in critical infrastructure. Hell nah

But could I could not care less if someone vibecodes a game or the one millionth second brain productivity app.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 14 points 2 weeks ago
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Its a way to imagine you don't need a developer.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is that “A1” coding for companies now?

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I thought that guy AL Jippity was just doing a ton of work. Like a 10,000x dev.

[–] sacredfire@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I remember when the term was first coined and it meant something like “asking an llm to code and NOT attempting to validate, fix or correct the outputs yourself. Just keep prompting in natural language until it works.” It was supposed to be a joke - this sort of use hits a wall pretty quickly and illustrates how limited llms can be.

The term has taken off and its meaning is now in flux. I did find it particularly amusing seeing all the LinkedIn lunatics start posting LLM written garbage about “integrating vibe coding Into your workflow” because they thought it was the new buzz word… and I guess they were right.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Hexarei@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's using tools like Claude or other agentic AI to collaboratively make an app. It's a fun novelty until you realize people paid more than you are doing it without knowing what they're doing and getting away with it.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

It's a great thing to point idea guys towards so they don't waste your time.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember when that chess champion accused that other chess champion of cheating? It's like that.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unless you're insinuating that using AI to vibe code is like sticking a vibrating dildo up your own ass just to "win" (and then get accused of cheating), then no... it's not at all like that, lol