this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
230 points (97.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63591 readers
691 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/35892866

Comments

Republished here, as AI content is in the Public Domain. References are available in the original article.

Frustrated by rising subscription costs and fragmented content availability, viewers worldwide are returning to piracy at unprecedented levels, reversing years of progress made by affordable streaming services. Recent data from London-based monitoring firm MUSO shows piracy visits skyrocketed from 130 billion in 2020 to 216 billion by 2024, with the industry facing projected losses exceeding $113 billion.

Subscription Fatigue Drives Digital Exodus


The streaming landscape has transformed from Netflix's early promise of "everything in one place" into what critics call "Cable 2.0"—a fractured ecosystem requiring multiple subscriptions. According to The Guardian, the average European household now spends close to €700 annually on three or more video-on-demand subscriptions. With Netflix's standard plan reaching $15.49 monthly and competitors following suit, consumers are increasingly viewing piracy as a rational alternative.

"Piracy is not a pricing issue, it's a service issue," Valve co-founder Gabe Newell observed in 2011—a prediction that appears prophetic as streaming platforms struggle with content fragmentation and rising prices. In Sweden, birthplace of both Spotify and The Pirate Bay, 25% of people surveyed admitted to pirating content in 2024, predominantly driven by those aged 15 to 24.

Content Wars Create Consumer Casualties


The fragmentation crisis has worsened as studios create exclusive content silos. Viewers face scenarios where favorite shows vanish from one platform only to appear on another, or require separate purchases despite existing subscriptions. Even purchased content can become unavailable due to licensing disputes, prompting consumer lawsuits against platforms like Amazon Prime Video.

MUSO data reveals that unlicensed streaming now accounts for 96% of all TV and film piracy, representing a fundamental shift in how content theft occurs. Modern pirates leverage sophisticated tools including AI-driven search engines and encrypted networks that adapt faster than anti-piracy measures can respond.

Industry Scrambles for Solutions


Streaming executives are experimenting with bundled offerings and cracking down on password sharing, but these measures often backfire by further alienating users. According to Antenna research, one-quarter of U.S. streamers are "chronic churners," frequently canceling subscriptions due to cost and frustration.

The resurgence marks a stark reversal from the mid-2010s when convenient, affordable streaming services nearly eliminated piracy. As one industry analyst noted, studios have created "artificial scarcity in a digital world that promised abundance", suggesting that without addressing core affordability and access issues, the piracy revival may continue reshaping entertainment consumption patterns.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 3 points 34 minutes ago

Hopefully this won't get me too much negative reaction: I'm not a proud pirate. I'd rather not pirate at all. I'm kind of ashamed that it's come to this.

There were a few solid years where I literally did not do it and felt no desire to, back when streaming was new, and there were only a few serious players. I'd love to return to that era, but I know it will never exist again.

So now, I and other members of my family, pay a ridiculous amount of money for a rotating suite of services, trying to do things the right way, and still, there are way too many times when we can't find anything we want to watch on any of those services and/or the thing we wanted to watch is not available on any of those services.

Finally broke down and just said fuck it. I tried to support this mess as best I could in hopes it would get better, but fully knowing it wouldn't. When it definitely did not get better I said no more.

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 2 points 17 minutes ago

Oh noes! Who could have seen this coming?

/s

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Hey, the Supreme Court said it’s cool for LLMs to pirate stuff for their bullshit so it’s free game. I’m not paying for shit. Just like that bullshit article that has been posted, which I won’t open

[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I am working on a prototype purely organic LLM called myself. In order to be able to interact with prompts that include popular media references I will train the model on TV shows and movies.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 points 49 minutes ago

Large Brain Move

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 hours ago

Action?

Reaction.

Choice?

Consequence.

[–] thedrizzle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Streaming issues aside, what is this?

Republished here, as AI content is in the Public Domain. References are available in the original article.

Why the hell are we posting this crap instead of linking the original article?

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/aug/14/cant-pay-wont-pay-impoverished-streaming-services-are-driving-viewers-back-to-piracy

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

Yar har etc...

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 45 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

“We think there is a fundamental misconception about piracy. Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem. If a pirate offers a product anywhere in the world, 24 x 7, purchasable from the convenience of your personal computer, and the legal provider says the product is region-locked, will come to your country 3 months after the US release, and can only be purchased at a brick and mortar store, then the pirate’s service is more valuable.”

  • GabenN

When what you're selling isn't appealing, then people won't buy it. It's not super complicated.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Realistically, if there was a service that had everything on it that was past the cinema/pay per view stage, and was a reasonable price (say £35 a month, the price of two current streaming services), then I would probably be on that instead of Jellyfin.

And I mean everything back to the dawn of time. Anything you want, TV series, movies, the lot. Original versions, directors cuts, etc. George fucking Lucas, I'm looking at you here.

But there isn't. There never will be. Because they're all in a race to grab as much money as they can, before literal heat death engulfs the whole planet.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 hours ago

This was close enough to what the og Netflix was and unsurprisingly it was incredibly popular.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 1 points 1 hour ago

They could make a Steam style store for movies to buy individual movies that then stay on your account. Deep deep discounts on some oldie movies intermittently. People would eat that shit up and buy whole movie libraries to keep. Way more movies than they could watch (like people do with a Steam library).

I've got my server more stable now so it works a lot more reliably for Jellyfin. Before now, my wife would wholeheartedly agree with this and insist on paying for Netflix

[–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 58 points 10 hours ago

No mention of advertising in streaming services now? That was a big factor in making me shut of my subscriptions. The price increases made me cut back but the ads have made me turn them off. I'm not paying to watch commercials.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 79 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Industry Scrambles for Solutions

Anything but solve the main issue: pirate sites offer a better service, with no stupid licensing problems, having everything on a single app and without geolocking bullshit.

When the pirate alternative it's not just cheaper but also way more convenient, it's no wonder they are losing customers.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Netflix: Pay for 4k, max at 720p in Firefox or Librewolf

Trackers: Don’t pay, actual 4k

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

DRM limiting the quality is the main reason I won't pay for streaming.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

That was my reason for cancelling. I can afford the service, but it better let me stream at full resolution through LibreWolf or I’m just gonna download the movies and shows.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 42 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly, if they came up with some open standard for payments, subscriptions, so that most users got seamless one stop shopping for all content without barriers the convenience would beat the price.

They don't have a piracy problem, they have a convenience problem.

[–] Emi@ani.social 27 points 11 hours ago

Like Gaben said, piracy is service problem.

It's so damn stupid. Every time i hear of a new show, I must look for which platform will have it in my country. And also which seasons, because it happens (with old shows specially) that they are fragmented, having some seasons here, some there, and some unavailable.

Then, I open stremio and the whole show is there, a single app with all the content.

Now tell me, if I want to watch that show, what should I do?

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There’s an easy solution to this. I pay for Apple Music because I get access to pretty much all the music I want. I can sideload what they don’t have, which isn’t much. They have better audio quality, and aren’t stiffing artists to pay some right wing nutjob science denier like the other streaming platform of note. I pay because I love music and want to support what I love. Why isn’t there a similar service for TV and movies? That’s the solution. Let us pay for what we love and make it easy. Apple figured it out with music. Valve figured it out with games.

I think they don’t want to solve the problem. I think they want to solve a different problem. I think they’re making this a problem so they can push legislation to protect their profits.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

As a musician who sees royalties, I thank you cos apple actually fucking pays out

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 minutes ago

Absolutely. But to clarify, Apple Music pays more per stream than Spotify and others. Spotify trends to cut bigger checks to popular musicians because they have more subscribers.

Also — someone feel free to fact check this — I’ve heard that if, say, you put an album out on BandCamp but not streaming, and I buy it and sideload it into both services, and you later add it to both services, Spotify won’t pay you for my streams because I’m streaming the sideloaded copy whereas Apple will match it. I keep the metadata if it’s different but you’d get paid for the streams because it matches it.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Alright, kinda fucked that everyone here is just like "AI generated news articles! Yay!" and not questioning the validity at all of an LLM. bruh.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 hours ago

Nobody reads the articles.

[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago

AI is piracy by corporations, kind of makes sense that this community doesn't care so much.

[–] MrTambourineMan@lemmy.zip 20 points 10 hours ago

I can literally pay for every service available in my area and still not watch everything (not to mention anything) I want. Geo-blocking as well as expired rights made me never want to pay for one of those overpriced services again as there is one option that's way more convenient, and by chance much cheaper too.

[–] yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Oh how could this happen? who knew...

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Quick, insert more ads to keep revenue up!

[–] mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

or how about another plan that costs a little more and it has a little less ads? then increase the ads and price!

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago

There’s just too many shit shows packaged along a few gems to make subscribing to the whole lot worthwhile.

And as a Canadian right now it feels downright patriotic to divert money from US-owned streaming companies who region-lock my purchases so I have to buy terrestrial cable to view them.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Damn for 700€ I can buy a bunch of blurays

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 4 points 9 hours ago

If three or four people did that and shared their library with friends then they would have a massive catalog between them.

Legally, you are allowed to make backups of the media you own (in the US). If a group of friends got together and shared their media libraries, proving that only one person was accessing the media at a time, then there would be no issue.

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Is the original post an AI "original" or an AI summary of an existing article?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 hours ago

You have to click through the reddit link to find the "original", which is a perplexity AI generated "article". It's all AI slop.

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

At the end of the day, all they are doing is waiting till the day that costs of piracy > money they make