this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
568 points (98.6% liked)

privacy

5969 readers
141 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The UK's Online Safety Act doesn't just age-gate porn; it blocks material deemed "harmful" to minors. Days after the law went into effect, reports of non-explicit content on social media getting blocked in the region started to crop up. Subreddits from r/IsraelCrimes to r/stopsmoking are now walled in the UK. Video games, Spotify, and dating apps have instituted or will institute age checks.

Given the SCOTUS age verification decision [June '25], Stabile fears that people [in the US] will go "mask off" in the fall and spring, when state legislatures start getting back together. "People are going to attempt to restrict the internet even more aggressively," Stabile said. "I think people are going to work to restrict all sorts of content, particularly LGBTQ content, but also content that is broadly defined as any sort of threat or propaganda to minors." Other experts Mashable spoke to agree with him.

"I'm going to jump to the end step," [Eric Goldman, law professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law] said. "The end step is that most online users are going to be required to age authenticate most of the time they visit websites. That's going to become the norm." In a paper he wrote, Goldman called these statutes "segregate-and-suppress" laws.

The stated reason behind these laws is to "protect children." But as journalist Taylor Lorenz pointed out, in the UK, age verification is already preventing children from accessing vital information, such as about menstruation and sexual assault.

"When we see crackdowns on spaces on the internet, we're essentially stripping away that potential for self-actualization," Goldman said. We've reached the dystopian stage of the internet, he added.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vane@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Bad news for HTTP are good news for P2P.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ehh maybe. Next they'll charge the ISP's with logging what we do and blocking unidentifiable traffic.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I think ISP are already logging what we do. ( at least in EU )

ISPs may engage in monitoring and filtering of communications data to fight viruses and overall ensure the security of the network

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A52012XX0208%2801%29

and all of the monitoring of course have

this does not apply when the purpose is based on security considerations

so given that there is war next door you can assume you're being monitored 24/7

also this

Article 6( c ) of the Data Protection Directive lays down the proportionality principle (34), which applies to ISPs, as they are data controllers in the meaning of this Directive, when they engage in monitoring and filtering.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

0 doubt you're being monitored, i'm more worried when they stop allowing you to pass secured traffic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

or we could just ban their ip range from every website idk

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Now it's all gone. I'll have to buy from resellers, like I'm some kind of drug addict lol.

They will come up with any excuse for total control. I can just see how they look at China and they are burning inside like how come they have everything under control, and our peasants still have freedom of thought, how should this be understood?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It literally only* affects corporate websites.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I knew what you meant to say, and now I'm left wondering how clumsy my fingers must be if I can accurately read a typo where 75% of the letters are wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I'm ready for the internet to end. This experiment has shown it is extremely harmful to society. Fucking end it already.

[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

the "early" internet was great. hell you don't even need to go back that far.

online games taught us that people all over the world are just like you. they are not some elusive foreign potential threat but chill people. everywhere

we found more common ground than differences, it was beautiful while it lasted . only in the recent times the big us-vs-them rift appeared everywhere

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Sure but the common ground isn't necessarily a good thing. It lets you retreat from in person community because you found someone to hang with that you have never met in person. It does encourage some healthy behaviors like work on interesting hobbies - but the homogenizing affects are worse. It has practically halted the evolution of small cultures and arts across the globe because they thrived in isolation. The world is too small; too mundane now. There is no wonder about what's abroad. Everything is at your fingertips and it's at everyone else's too.

[–] Laurentide@pawb.social 3 points 4 days ago

My in-person community was toxic and abusive, and I didn't even realize it until I found a warm, accepting, and much healthier online community to compare with. "Retreating" was a survival need. I'm glad your offline community isn't harmful to you but don't assume that is the case for everyone.

I'm also part of one of those small artistic cultures you mentioned and it evolved and thrived way more with the arrival of the internet than it ever did in the days of small in-person gatherings and physical-only publishing. Art is furthered by cultural contact and mutual exchange of ideas, not isolation.

Now, you do have a point that there is a problem with homogeneity and stagnation these days, but the real cause of it is late-stage capitalism. The harder it is for the average person to make a living, the more they are forced to focus all of their energy on making money. For an artist, that means not having any time for masterpieces or experimental projects because Fast and Marketable is the only way to make rent. Arts and culture are starving because a small number of billionaires are sucking up all the financial nutrients (and then passing censorship laws to cut down anything that still manages to grow, until the only things left are as boring and mundane as they are.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You’re free to leave anytime. You could live a simple life out in the boonies working on a small farm and 99% of internet shit would go away.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago

Me leaving wouldnt solve the problem of the brain rot it causes 90% of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 7 points 5 days ago (4 children)

TOR and i2p and VPNs? Are we skating towards a 100% encrypted internet?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›