this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
568 points (98.6% liked)

privacy

5969 readers
141 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The UK's Online Safety Act doesn't just age-gate porn; it blocks material deemed "harmful" to minors. Days after the law went into effect, reports of non-explicit content on social media getting blocked in the region started to crop up. Subreddits from r/IsraelCrimes to r/stopsmoking are now walled in the UK. Video games, Spotify, and dating apps have instituted or will institute age checks.

Given the SCOTUS age verification decision [June '25], Stabile fears that people [in the US] will go "mask off" in the fall and spring, when state legislatures start getting back together. "People are going to attempt to restrict the internet even more aggressively," Stabile said. "I think people are going to work to restrict all sorts of content, particularly LGBTQ content, but also content that is broadly defined as any sort of threat or propaganda to minors." Other experts Mashable spoke to agree with him.

"I'm going to jump to the end step," [Eric Goldman, law professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law] said. "The end step is that most online users are going to be required to age authenticate most of the time they visit websites. That's going to become the norm." In a paper he wrote, Goldman called these statutes "segregate-and-suppress" laws.

The stated reason behind these laws is to "protect children." But as journalist Taylor Lorenz pointed out, in the UK, age verification is already preventing children from accessing vital information, such as about menstruation and sexual assault.

"When we see crackdowns on spaces on the internet, we're essentially stripping away that potential for self-actualization," Goldman said. We've reached the dystopian stage of the internet, he added.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 235 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (9 children)

Age verification isn't really age verification: it's identity verification. And once you have given your identity to one or two websites, data brokers will ensure that all your other activity on the internet will eventually be tied to it. Burner devices and anonymous VPNs could help, but only until those become illegal too.

This will have a chilling effect on not only every kind of discourse the fascists hate, but also political organization and people's ability to resist. You won't be able to organize a protest online without the police knowing in advance who is likely to come and finding a pretext to intimidate or pre-arrest them.

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 70 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's the most insightful and chilling comment I've read in a while. I especially like the "it's not age verification; it's identity verification" part. (That messaging needs to be more commonplace.) The key(s) for organizing data about individuals online will shift from email addresses only to enough stable identifiers to impersonate someone or maybe even steal their identity. Data leaks and fraud will probably increase dramatically given the value-add of these data.

With the level of quashing dissent these days - eg UK police arresting hundreds of nonviolent people with placards denouncing genocide; military deployments in LA and DC - no wonder certain states/ governments support online identity verification laws.

"No Kings" protests are already a non-story in mainstream news today. Tomorrow, they can be prevented from happening in the first place! /s c/aboringdystopia

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

And one key thing. Fascists and fascist collaborators will claim, "everything you do online and already tracked to your real identity." But the truth is, if that were already the case, then there wouldn't be a push for these identity verification laws.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You won’t be able to organize a protest online without the police knowing in advance who is likely to come and finding a pretext to intimidate or pre-arrest them.

That's been true for a while. But it was "The FBI can put a pin in it" true before. And now it feels like "LinkedIn is going to have a second secret file on you" true.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Fun fact:

That was the plan all along.

The guy who founded LinkedIn... Paypal mafia
The guys who invested in Facebook. . PayPal mafia
The guys who founded YouTube.... Paypal mafia
The guy who founded Square .... Paypal mafia
The guy who ran doge and got all your us gov datasets, has literally half of all satellites in orbit sucking up your location and data... Paypal mafia

The guy who decides who attends the bilderberg group, is ceo of the ai that is used by nearly every police force in the USA, and has contracts with military, who funded trump and Vance... Paypal Mafia

These guys have literally created the techno society we are now slaves to.

They are just getting started.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They are just getting started.

Idk, man. Seems like they're wrapping up. Not a whole lot left to do when you're this far up on the board.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] figjam@midwest.social 17 points 5 days ago

Time to start making zines and locally organizing i guess

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

18+ to shop at Walmart. I don't want my children exposed to harmful things like books, my boys shouldn't be exposed to cleaning supplies or see women's garments and my girls shouldn't have to see that other girls are allowed to pick out their outfits or do manly things like play sports.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's not about protecting the children and never has been with the Party of Pedos. It's about control.

Outlaw porn. Then start calling LGBTQ folks pornographic. Now it's illegal to be gay. You KNOW they are going in that direction.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Stephen Fry’s character in V For Vendetta is a perfect depiction of this

https://youtu.be/jtVWdplyDx8

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 108 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Nuclear weapons are harmful to children.

Global warming is harmful to children.

Microplastics and forever chemicals are harmful to children.

But, no, let’s just block the porn.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The felon sitting in the Oval Office is harmful to children.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

*The pedophile king whose name has been confirmed to be in the Epstein files

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 11 points 5 days ago

The world is on fire

But don't say "cunt"

Angelspit - Don't Say

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 27 points 4 days ago

Pornographic content is literally & figuratively the canary in the coal mine of the internet.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 74 points 5 days ago (5 children)

We need to purge our society of these genital obsessed religious extremists

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

genital obsessed religious extremists

A lot of these people are pedophiles just like the owner class so it makes sense why they always get good representation

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 55 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Remember, according to the UK government you're legally able to have sex, give birth, choose your future, and (soon?) vote at 16. Heaven forfend if you see a pair of titties though, you're not mature enough for that...

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You can have sex, but you better not look!

I'm not against a bit of spice, but blindfolds at 16 just seem a little advanced. Especially when sex at that age is akin to a oblong peg in a tesseract shaped hole of unknown location.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

"I’m fairly sure if they took porn off the internet, there’d only be one website left, and it’d be called Bring back the porn!"

- Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago (6 children)

The very instant a website wants me to verify my age by providing PII, I’ll just blacklist that website from my network. There isn’t a single website that I can’t go without.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 36 points 5 days ago (32 children)

Until they ban Tor there will always be porn available.

This isn't about protecting children.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 5 days ago

It never was. But that is hard to discuss. I remember when I still was young and went to house parties decades ago when my country discussed yet again some measures "to protect the children", don't recall exactly what, you found lots young people who of course couldn't be against protecting the children. How could you be against that? It's such a shitty way to get these things through.

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This isn’t about protecting children.

This is about narrative control on the internet.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 15 points 4 days ago (4 children)

We need to consider building on and spreading the word about other protocols like Tor, Yggdrassil etc etc. Show people that the Commons cannot be stolen again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 18 points 4 days ago

The first time this PII is leaked about some politician's online search history, it will all get repealed.

Wanna stop this? Get some whale to buy up the data and find people pushing this shit and any mass adoption for these things will die. Politicians like to eat up religious lobbyist's shit until it's used to expose their less savory activities to the greater population.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"Poorly Implemented Attempt to Censor Porn will Ruin Corporate Internet"

There, FTFY

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 25 points 5 days ago

The stated reason behind these laws is to "protect children."

https://imgur.com/QqabC7T

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Somewhere in the UK, a 13 year old has already figured out a way to bypass it and watch porn.

That's what young me would have done.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago

It was porn watching that initially pushed the internet technology to be better. Everything comes full circle.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago

"This isn't the end of a battle," he said. "This is the beginning of one."

I love that line so much, it goes hard and is kinda punk as fuck.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 5 days ago

UK isnt so puritanical as the US, the sudden shift is very suspect of the actors behind these legislations all over the world.

[–] Yezzey@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

We have the dark web as backup.

load more comments
view more: next ›