this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
719 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

6971 readers
1805 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

I am a straight white man and I can’t even weigh in on this issue because if I defend the bi ppl ill get a stigma attached to me

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

i do wild shit to make the girls im dating lose attraction for me all the time. burping really loud constantly, saying the word "COCKS" when i sneeze, crying about wall-e, shitting with the door open. who cares?

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 31 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

I've seen so many cases of staunch progressive groups weaponize a guys sexuality as soon as they have a falling out with him. Its like these people never believed what they were saying. People are so spineless and have no morals.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Sadly, this is a human trait overall. It's deep in the lizard brain section from early in our evolution.

If someone is part of a group and then does something seen as against the interest of the group (or groupthink, really) then any tiny little thing can become a trait leveraged against them. Either the person on the outs basically accepts demotion on the social ladder and hopes for re-acceptance from the group as subservient to everyone, or they're just out for good. It's one of our worst traits from a rational perspective, it's violent and irrational monkey-brain shit, and likely made for small homogeneous, tight-knit groups that could count on each other to survive harsh environmental conditions.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

In my older age I've come to the realization that a lot of people join movements just to belong, not because they actually hold the conviction. I think in fact there are people who aren't capable of even having a conviction, just bouncing between whatever expressive habits are most convenient socially

You see it with things like politics and religion too

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Its hard to be morally consistent. But not impossible.

[–] dermanus@lemmy.ca 25 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

My favourite is the ones who scream about slut shaming then use "virgin" as an insult.

Although that seems to have fallen out of fashion lately.

That specific insult I mean, not hypocrisy.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It's not out of fashion at all, "virgin" just became "incel". The intent is identical.

[–] DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

Not at all. Incels are almost overwhelmingly misogynistic and into a lot of weird pseudo scientific shit. Incels are those claiming they deserve women but at the same time don't deserve them because they're too beta and all the rich alphas are getting 10 chicks a second, so they excuse their lack of success with dating in a lot of made up bullshit to delude themselves into never improving as people.

Incels are not just virgins, they're basically a cult, and thinking people use it just as 'virgin' is either deliberately obtuse or ignorant

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Not really. Incel implies a level of indoctrination into a misogynistic POV that has you convinced that you’re better off alone. It’s not the same as insulting someone for simply not having had sex yet.

edit: not that I think either is a productive thing to call another person

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Incel implies a level of indoctrination into a misogynistic POV

No one is thinking this deeply when they call a man who just said/did something they don't like an "incel". People just use it mindlessly as an insult, same as with "virgin".

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Maybe if they’re really young and weren’t on the internet when the word became popular, sure

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

People always say stuff to me like, “You definitely live with your parents”. That one is super common. Like, who cares? It’s weird for me personally because I moved out over 20 years ago, but nothing wrong if I did live with my folks. It’s a world as hard as stone out there.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If he's a hot twink, then yeah no that'd be fine with me. Perfectly understandable.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Everymans straight until they meet a cute twink

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 27 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

People like this are the progressive version of evangelicals. And like with Christianity they don't get called out enough to keep it from becoming a major problem.

Villainizing male sexuality is why we have a whole new generation boys heading into alt right circles and so far the response has been a variant of telling them to 'man up.' And its going to get a lot worse before it gets even a little better.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

OMG i've been saying this for years and every time I get bashed for it (in liberal/left/prog circles)

Because you can't suggest that the (liberal/left/blue/prog/nonfash) aren't perfect or are doing something not ideal

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

they don’t get called out enough to keep it from becoming a major problem.

idk man 9 times out of 10 I hear someone talking about progressives, they're exclusively referring to the most hypocritical ones. Like, when does anyone talk about the normal progressives that just want good things for everyone? That's boring.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 17 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

This is the root of the problem with much of the discussion around male identity online.

Women finally, and rightfully, gained a voice, and plenty of dudes listened. Many of them, not really understanding feminism as an academic discipline or having any real sympathy towards any aspect of being a man, used that voice to point of the many issues faced by women in the world and to fight for women.

Where this falls apart is that because of the lack of real understanding regarding feminism and the concept of patriarchy, a lot of it boiled down to "shut up, the women are talking" and "we don't care about your problems"

None of this makes the problems away, none of this is really geared towards equality, and much of it is just switching the genders on deeply toxic patriarchal power structures that were used to oppress women for centuries.

When you think about how stupid 90% of the people involved on both sides of this discourse online are, it's of little surprise so many women went looking for easy answers from hucksters who pitched exploitation and oppression as empowerment.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›