@maniacalmanicmania TL;DR
;)
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
23 points (84.8% liked)
Australia
4489 readers
100 users here now
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The main thing is the little black lines – the “confidence interval” – a statistical measure of uncertainty that can be used when showing the average value of data from a survey (or other type of research).
And what this means, which I have confirmed with the ABS, is that the reading rates are statistically the same for males and females within all generations with the exception of gen X.
Is this correct? I haven't studied statistics since high school so I am completely clueless, but it doesn't make sense based on my rudimentary understanding of what a confidence interval is supposed to do. The confidence intervals overlap, but they are not identical. Doesn't that mean that reading rates could be statistically the same, but not that they are statistically the same?
Anyway, I also found it interesting that men read more magazines than women now too, considering it was historically the other way around and that many men actually believed its existence as a societal norm was an example of their superior rational minds.
Yes, it means could be the same, not are the same. It does mean they are confident (95% confident, I assume, I'm not clicking through to the study) that the rates are different for men and women in Gen X
It does mean they are confident that the rates are different for men and women in Gen X
Umm, surely not? If the confidence intervals overlap it means that they are not confident that the rates are different, doesn't it? Of course, it also does not mean that they can say they are confident that the reading rates are the same.
So the statistically sound way of saying it is that the null hypothesis is that reading rates are the same, and their study has failed to reject the null hypothesis.
Gen X is the only category for which the CIs don't overlap at all
Oh right I see, sorry.
If you want to be precise, overlapping intervals mean that we lack evidence to assert that the means are statistically different for our chosen confidence level. This is often simplified to the statement that they are statistically the same.
I read 23 books so far this year. I'm doing my part.
Read 100 last year and at 25 now this year. Lower now since no longer have a job that let's me read.
But I have listen to 25 so far of audiobooks, which is beating last years count of 24 total.
I managed 55 last year and I don't know how I did that.
One page at a time. Just like writing.
What have you read if you don't mind telling us.
- Ralph Lister's Skyhold series - Really great fun
- Devoured all of Honor Harrington by David Weber in about 3 months. It was all I could do not to just start them again I wanted more!
- Kevin J Anderson's Hidden Empire series. A really interesting concept of an antagonist alien species. I liked them.
- Julie Kagawa's Talon books - a fun bit of Urban Fantasy about dragons that shape shift into human form and try to live among us. I'm probably not its target demographic (but I like middle school and teen books more than I'm probably meant to), but I'd read these again.
- Currently reading Naomi Novik's Telemere series and I'm 100% hooked. It's more dragons, but this time set in the Napolionic wars.
That Everything is Tuberculosis is on my wishlist. How was it?
I gave it 1 star because it was so damn boring. I don't usually read nonfiction and this book reminded me why. So if you like nonfiction give it a try.
I do but has to keep my interest. I plan on doing that.
since His Lordship's ADHD diagnosis he's stopped fighting himself and now chiefly audiobooks. His "reading" intake has upped significantly.
Tl:dr?
We need to bring back playboy!
@MantisToboggon "I only buy it for the articles!"😉 @maniacalmanicmania
Ever read a Playboy magazine? Without any exaggeration or sarcasm, those articles were often really good!
I'm reading right now. Ohh, you mean books? I plead the fifth.
The fifth what?
THE FIFTH!!!
A lot of Australians (and this is an Australian Lemmy instance) might not know what you mean.
Fair point. I rarely pay attention to the instance.
Fifth amendment of the US constitution. It's the right to not self-incriminate. i.e. pleading the fifth means you're not going to answer a question or in this context, not provide relevant information.
It's not just an Australian instance, this is an Australian community lol
@maniacalmanicmania I can say that my OH has increased his amount of reading in the past two years.
I am very impressed that a hydroxyl group can read at all, let alone increase their amount of reading!