this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023

456 points (97.9% liked)

shitposting

1611 readers

4 users here now

Rules •1. No Doxxing •2. No TikTok reposts •3. No Harassing •4. Post Gore at your own discretion, Depends if its funny or just gore to be an edgelord.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

not@lemmy.ml

456

Marriage (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by Facelikeapotato@lemmy.ml to c/shitposting@lemmy.ml

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought the marines were about eating crayons and doing warcrimes

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 23 points 2 years ago

No that's marriage

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If, "Something greater," means "oil," then that matches up with my service.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We switched to water based lubricant in our marriage, I highly recommend it over oil

[–] rgb3x3@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thank you for bringing freedom to the oil. It needed it.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago

Freedom to get in my fuckin SUV for 12 mpg I'll tell you hwat

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Happiness is always waaaaaay down the list of things people need by the folks that try to define what the purpose of something is

Edit: oh and marriage is just an atavism from what used to be a property arrangement, monogamy and commitment aren’t confined to the institution

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought the marines were about fanatical devotion to the God-Emperor of Mankind and huge pauldrons.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

You thought wrong.

Marines are about fanatical devotion to the forces of Chaos and huge spikey pauldrons.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Honor, courage, commitment.

Oh wait..

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

this tweet is inaccurate, it doesn't mention eating crayons at all

This tweet is clearly about being an educator

[+] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl -30 points 2 years ago (6 children)

marriage is an institution to protect kids, to make sure they get the best possible upbringing. people who think it's all about their own personal happiness are just nacissists

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 19 points 2 years ago

best possible upbringing

Do you mean abuse and indoctrination in the name of "saving my soul" and instilling "traditional values" in me by parents who hate each other but stuck together "for my sake" (while subconsciously taking it out on me)? Because that's what I got. Thanks, much appreciated...

The abuse taught me why religion needs to be destroyed, as well as to never trust the ones who are supposed to love me. It taught me to fight for myself, and never trust, never assume, never give in. It taught me to give up any hope in humanity or god, and accept will as the only force that matters.

It also gave me severe anxiety, depression, a suicide attempt, and taught me how to hate myself. So thanks for the trauma.

But "marriage must never be broken. It's sacred, for the good of the kids..."

[–] Eylrid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

No marriage is better than a bad marriage.

When the parents' relationship is happy, healthy, and supportive it's fantastic for the kids. My parents' relationship is like that. They've had their bumps and issues, but for the most part they are great together. It was a great environment to grow up in.

But if the parents are unhappy or have a toxic relationship it is so damaging to both the parents and the kids. In a situation like that everyone involved, including the kids, is better off with divorce. My sister was in a bad marriage. It was so damaging to her kids. The divorce process was messy and hurtful, but once the dust settled the kids thrived much better than they did when their parents were still married. Never stay in a marriage for the kids.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Two people trapped in an unhappy marriage will absolutely not give the best possible upbringing to a child.

[+] trailing9@lemmy.ml -9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right, but you want children to learn that they stick to their duties. Not the best for the child but the best for society and if it is a good society, the best for the child.

People are only trapped if they cannot change. What's the bigger trap, that you have to find people who suit you or that you can find common ground with everybody?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, kids should be taught that things aren't set in stone

We shouldn't follow duties if they're not working out for anybody. We shouldn't keep doing things as we always have when that doesn't work anymore, or one can go about it in a better way. One should embrace change, and not be scared of it.

In addition, people can change for the worse (or reveal their true nature), and not want to get better. My parents aren't good people, and I refuse to follow any "but it's your duty and they are your parents!!" that society and others try to press onto me. And neither will I bother with following society's standard for marriage and monogamy, and instead do what is best for me in my life.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago

I agree. I just think that marriage can also be an opportunity to change for the better, most of the times when both are ready for change.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago

Ergo, single parents are always worse for kids than two married parents? Or is your view more nuanced than your stated?

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Marriage as an institution was created to share and gain wealth. It has fuck all to do with children's well-being.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

Marriage is the union of two narcissists, yes. (I believe Robert Heinlein said that, but I can't seem to find a direct reference)