this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
465 points (99.4% liked)

Antiwork

4953 readers
31 users here now

Date Created: June 21, 2023

This community supports labor, with an aspiration for it to cease to be required to live our lives. Members of this community want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and/or want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! Some of the more talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules


The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/


2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments


Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.


3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved


Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.


4. Educate don’t attack


No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.


5. No Advertising


Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service


6. No factually misleading information


Content that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.


7. Headlines


If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.


8. Staff Discretion


Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


9. No posting links to Twitter/X or Meta owned properties


Social Media products such as Twitter/X and Meta Properties (e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Threads) are known low quality information sources - they actively spread misinformation without sufficient moderation, hate speech. These platforms each have billionaire owners working actively to eliminate labor protections through direct action, lobbying, performative large scale layoffs and attacks on institutions that enforce labor law.

You are not encouraged to do so, but you may post screenshots from these sites IF THE INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE ON ANOTHER VALID PLATFORM. Screenshots must include info to support a relevant conversation within this community and must show a VISIBLE time/date stamp for posterity. If you are caught manipulating content of a screenshot, your post will be removed and you will receive an indefinite ban from this community at the discretion of the moderator(s)

No pass through/archive services are allowed as they potentially feed traffic back to these services, directly or indirectly (e.g. Services like Xcancel or Nitter)



Antiwork Suggested Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

Active stats from all Antiwork instances

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Training repayment agreement provisions (TRAPs),are a new form of “stay-or-pay” contract that indebts employees to their bosses. Often inserted into contracts without workers’ knowledge, these restrictive labor covenants turn employer-sponsored job training and education programs into conditional loans that must be paid back — sometimes at a premium — if employees leave before a set date.

Employers argue that these clauses are a way to recoup their investment in employees who decide to leave the company prematurely. But these contracts have come under fire from labor groups and regulators. Oftentimes, the amount of debt demanded under TRAP contracts — which can be upward of $50,000 — is far higher than the employer’s training costs.

SLAVERY, WITH EXTRA STEPS.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zink@programming.dev 15 points 1 day ago

Employers argue that these clauses are a way to recoup their investment in employees

Uhhh, don't the employers get to keep all the profit from the employee's productivity because their role is to take financial risks to reap the rewards?

And the employees just get their paycheck because they are just selling their time to the employer and not participating in the risk vs reward?

This is just the 37th consecutive flavor of socialize the losses, privatize the profits.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Employers argue that these clauses are a way to recoup their investment in employees who decide to leave the company prematurely.

Employers can go fuck themselves. You're recouped on those training costs when the people that receive that training become better at their jobs and make the stupid number go up. If employers want to treat people like fucking investments, they need to learn the risk of losing money on their investments.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If employers want to treat people like fucking investments

They might say they want to do that, but it's been pretty clear for a long time that what they (at least the conservatively-minded ones) want is to treat people like property.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's also become very clear for a long time that they've considered the idea of losing money or making less than they imagined on an investment to be an unacceptable failure of the system

[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Classic indentured servitude.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah like thats literally the method that was used for indentured servitude. Like the Irish still make it their whole point of how they were also slaves by that metric.
Holy crap at the things we are bringing back to appease rich people.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Back when I was first trying to get a job in the programming world (in the mid-90s), I submitted my resume to a supposed job-finding company named SearchMasters. When I went to interview with them, I learned that their fee was 33% of your salary for your first six months on the job. This was clearly insane, but it got even worse: if you quit the job or were fired before the six months was up, you were immediately liable to pay SearchMasters the remainder of what their fee would have been in its entirety. I told the dude (an obvious steroid user squeezed into a garish tight suit) "I thought indentured servitude was illegal" and at one point I found myself trying to extract my resume from under his arm while he was alpha-male glowering at me while leaning on it with his full weight.

I dealt with a lot of headhunting firms in my first few years of working and it's a scummy industry, but SearchMasters put them all to absolute shame. And this was a big room with like 30 agents working in it, so there must have been thousands of poor bastards that had fallen for their bullshit, just in my city alone.

Edit: I mis-remembered this. The fee was 33% for the first year, but you were only on the hook for six months of that if you quit before the six months was up.

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 159 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Me, before I read the article: this is nothing unusual, and I don't see what the problem is. My employers have paid for some pretty advanced training over the years. In return, they asked me to agree to stay for six months. NBD...

Me, after the article: HOLY FUCKING SHIT!

This shift has also opened the door to a new industrial complex of employer-run, for-profit training sites and academies, which many workers are steered into when they’re hired for a job. Critics say employers now use these job training programs to force workers into debt and suppress wages, courtesy of TRAP contracts.

This is heading into Company Town territory. Seriously predatory shit.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

This is heading into Company Town territory. Seriously predatory shit.

More like indentured servitude, or semi-voluntary slavery, as 1990s school books liked to sell it.

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All they have left is rent seeking, even hiring an employee has to be part of some ponzi scheme

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

Because number must always go up. Must find new means of extraction.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Maybe if you have good deals in the company store it could be nice, right?

The gross part is that company scrip is still technically legal, as long as they pay at least minimum wage in USD. Like they can advertise a $700 per hour job… And only $7.25 is in USD, the remaining $692.75 is in company scrip. And they’ll claim that their scrip is valuable (and more convenient) to the employees, but a loaf of bread in the company store costs $1400.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] firewyre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fuck. That. Noise.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Shit. They used to do this a lot in my industry. You’d not get paid during training, or you’d sign a contract that if you succeeded training you’d be required to work for that employer usually for two years. If you left before the time was up, you owed the employer whatever pro-rated time you had remaining vs the stated cost of your training. Was still happening with signing bonuses recently.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I used to live in Tucson Arizona which for a time was like the call center capital of the US. there were SO MANY call centers there that they would hire literally anyone with a pulse. if you quit one you could quite literally go back a few months later and get your job back because the turn over was just so massive. And they all had paid like 2 week training.

So you can see where this is going and how exploitable it was. This was the early 00's and me and a friend of mine being broke 20 year olds decided to do just that. We wanted to get paid to literally just sit there, not answer phones, nothing. just get paid for doing nothing. So we'd both go to one call center, get hired, do the 2 week training, get paid, quit, go to the next call center, repeat. Eventually once you made the first round of all the call centers you could literally just start the chain over again because by that point enough time had passed that the first call center would hire you again. We did this for like a solid year. Just get paid to sit there and listen to a dude talk.

The only reason we stopped doing it was because it was SO boring.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Hah, at that point you could’ve gotten hired on as a trainer, a better pay, and never had to answer a phone.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 65 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Here's a few tricks that will ensure your employees can NEVER leave, you will save a ton on turnover.

  1. Pay above market
  2. Treat employees with respect, engrain this culture in your management
  3. Offer good benefits options
  4. Ensure there are long-term opportunities for career growth at all levels
  5. Communicate routinely from the upper management to the whole organization. Create opportunities for people to provide feedback in small groups
  6. Never even consider making employees liable for training you encouraged them to do. Fire anyone who suggests you write something so insane into a contract immediately

There are still companies out there where the primary way people leave is via retirement. They are profitable and productive companies. Employees want to leave immediately after getting trainings because turnover has become the dominant culture in large companies.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can confirm high pay works.

My job is shit, most of the stuff is broken, but on weekends I get $45 AUD an hour so I bitch about it instead of quitting. I'm not getting that pay elsewhere, especially not locally.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People don’t quit bad jobs; They quit bad pay and bad management. There are people whose job is to pump shit. Literally roll a shit-sucker truck up to a site, pump a bunch of shit out of a hole, (porta-potty, septic tank, outhouse, etc), drive the shit truck all the way across town, and reverse the shit-sucking process to blow all of the shit out of the truck at a waste treatment plant.

It’s a really fucking bad job… You need to have a strong stomach, and you’ll go home smelling like literal shit every single day. But people still wake up and choose to do it every day, because it pays well and management typically stays out of their hair.

[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago

Smelling like shit is a perk if it keeps middle management away.

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Same, I routinely get called out to fuck around on rooftops working on HVAC equipment either when it is -20F at midnight in the dead of winter or 100F with 80% humidity in the middle of summer (those are the only times HVAC equipment goes down). But if its an emergency call out then I make $50 USD per hour drive time included which is damn good for my low cost of living area so I am more than happy to do it.

If you pay well enough then you will find people willing to put up with the absolute worst work conditions. If companies want to keep people then they either need to make the work conditions better or pay more. It's that simple. If you can't make the conditions better then you need to increase the pay to account for that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

how do we keep people working for us? Shall we pay them better? Nah we will just coerce them.

[–] THB@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Some C-suite asshole really thought they were clever shoehorning that "TRAP" acronym in there. These people are just sociopathic children with too much money and power.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago

They make good fertilizer, though, and there is that whole pesky "world hunger" things still going on. 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

sociopaths are very effective at capturing positions of power, but pretty terrible at actually doing anything productive with it

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just in case anyone missed this gem from a few months ago: https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/dont-tell-me-this-is-a-functional-country Case example for emts getting the same treatment.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

When I was working as an EMT for a private company, we spent 30 minutes getting a patient to the ER following a stroke. This was one of the very rare times when that short window kept that dude alive (The overwhelming majority of people going to the hospital are not actually dying. Not even all stroke patients, or even most stroke patients.). I have no idea what that guy paid us, but I was making $9.50/hour, so I banked $4.75.

Two patients later I had offset the cost of my fast-food dinner. /s

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Until they reach a certain age anyway

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm certain that hiring managers would view reading the entire employment contract a major red flag.

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Ah so slavery, the wonders of capitalism

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

This is called indentured servitude

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

They can't take what you don't have.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The article is mixing two different concepts one sucks one doesn't.

  • The one that sucks is when an employer requires an employee to do training as a condition of the job, and then puts the threat of repaying that cost of that training back on the employee. This needs to change or be regulated for the fairness to the employee.
  • The one that doesn't suck is when the employer offers the option for employees to get training/college education paid for with not obligation to do so to keep the job. Even these usually only have 1 year or so of that repayment requirement if they leave early. The article is calling out Chipotle for offering free college tuition, as long as the employee continues to work there for 6 months after the last payment was made to the college. That is shorter than most employers which require 1 year. I used a benefit like this at a past employer to finish my Bachelors degree and which meant I never had to take out student loans.

Mixing both of these types of training/education paths in one article equating them as parts of the same thing is a bad thing. Employer reimbursed college tuition is one of the few ways that many students are able to obtain higher education without taking on burdensome student loans.

[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Aye, let's add another good one in the mix, pensions! Good ol' Golden Handcuffs. Its like companies have been trying for years to see what's the bare minimum we're willing to accept.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 17 points 3 days ago

This TRAP clause started to spread through new graduate nurses hired during the pandemic 21-22. The one I was given specific numbers on was $8500 if they left before 2yrs. Rumors speak of sums as high as $14k. This is fairly new practice in non-HCA hospitals based on what I’ve been told.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's NO WAY that Forcing Unhappy Workers to stay will BACKFIRE!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ok, maybe my brain is malfunctioning, but how would this play out if the employee just said, "ok, then I'm going to be an absolute nuisance at work until you fire me"?

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

From the article:

A cargo pilot faced a $20,000 lawsuit over job-training expenses at a commercial airline that had just fired him for refusing to fly a plane under unsafe conditions.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago

Clown country

[–] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That sounds like a clumsy way to do it. It's difficult to argue that refusal to do your job isn't intentional fuckery. But I can think of many creative ways of just being hapless at your job. Also, it seems very odd if the employee could just fire you for any reason and then demand payment. I mean, considering that the costs they demand to be paid back generally is higher than the actual cost for the employer, I can see business 'opportunities' where they just give you the training and immediately fire you afterwards for any arbitrary reason, and make a profit in the process. Sounds wild.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Can't we just...torch an important corporate building to the ground so they can learn?

[–] theterrasque 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Damage to company or rich people's property? Why, that sounds like terrorism

[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It's not terrorism if the target is evil incarnate

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

When I first watched the show "Continuum" 2012-2015 I thought yeah, this is a good message to get us back on the right track. However the life debt part of it is a little over the top. No way that kind of shit can happen in real life. For fucks sake.

load more comments
view more: next ›