this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
324 points (98.5% liked)

News

37047 readers
2705 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 67 points 7 months ago (4 children)

We can't be giving homeless people free drinking water when there's golf courses to maintain in the desert /s

It's ridiculous how society treats homeless people like pests

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We need to reinforce our free water at businesses law that made the businesses liable if someone is turned away and suffers injury without water

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 14 points 7 months ago

Not all places have this law, although it probably should be a law everywhere. That said, most businesses are able to skirt it fairly easily by giving away tiny cups of water. Some buy tiny cups just for this purpose and nothing else

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In Arizona the water mainly goes to grow alfalfa. In the desert. For the Saudis.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Golf is a surge upon this earth. Wasting water in deserts. Wasting what could be green space in cities

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

A scourge, even.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

creates them and then treats them like pests.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] CrazyHorse@lemmy.cafe 9 points 7 months ago

Arrest and body cam footage and better they be buttery brown so it gets approved so they can really suffer.

[–] InvestBurnout@fedia.io 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It'll probably be better for them in prison.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago

Everyone keeps saying this, but these people will not end up in prison, they will end up in a fucking concentration camp with no due process.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is Arizona remember.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was homeless in Phoenix in 2008 and it was beyond brutal. The heat was so intense that the soles of my shoes partially melted one day. I used to break into apartment complex pools just to cool down. And then monsoon season is a whole other beast.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That city is a monument to the arrogance of man.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I grew up there. It's definitely hot, but I can say living in a high humidity city in the south can feel much worse.

With low humidity if you're in the shade Phx is great most of the year. You'll sit outside and eat in the 90s. Sure, above 110F is friggin' hot but 95F and 90% humidity in GA or FL or south TX is worse if you're outside, and shade doesn't protect you from humidity. 115F has its own special problems like how hot car door handles and metal seat belt buckles get, but that's better than the hot wet blanket effect you get in the south during the summer.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh. I was just making a KotH reference. Ive never been.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You reference was understood.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We live in a true dystopia. The headlines are so insane as to prompt laughter and tears. I especially like this one from the very next post in my feed:

Suspect in Austin Target shooting that killed 3 people was found naked and holding Bible

What will people who study us 1000 years from now think? The sane ones advanced technology in remarkable ways, yet they allowed the most insane among them to lead their society. They used taxes to help fund miraculous pharmaceutical research, but then allowed private companies to reap all the profits, and to price the drugs beyond what the citizens could afford. They were fully aware of their downfall yet somehow powerless to stop it.

[–] if_only@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What will people who study us 1000 years from now think?

"Wow, things were like this even back then!"

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago

Humans be crazy.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It will not be a problem for long. Mr. Trump will fix it. The homeless will no longer be in the city, so no chance of heat injury

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, a city in the middle of the desert, where men was not supposed to go, taunting the will of god like Babel, might not be the best place to keep homeless people around.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's not that someone's "keeping them around." They live there.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You are free to assume that I made a deliberte word choice there, or you can just assume that I mean something sensible with it. Whatever suits you best.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not trying to be dense here, but what sensible thing did you mean?

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough, "sensible" is a very subjective term these days, always has been, but now even more. I mean to not leave people out on the street to die in scolding hot temperatures, but rather arrange for decent emergency shelters and ultimately proffesional help to get people back on their feet, or at least off the street.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Ah, that is sensible. Thanks for clarifying, and I agree. Homelessness is a failure of a community. If the climate is already hostile to people who have shelter, we better make damn sure unhoused people are protected too.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

And people wonder why there are so many homeless people in California.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Ain't that America?! Home of the fee baby!

[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If they didn’t want to be burned by the sidewalk, why did they choose to become homeless?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

They should have just asked for a bigger allowance from Daddy.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)
  1. Find a MAGA idio-er-person you're on... level footing with and bet that next year, temperatures will be higher.
  2. Wait a year
  3. Profit
[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is what all the people telling the MAGA crowd that there is no global warming are already doing

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Instead of helping people, they're villainizing them. Disgusting

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I don't understand why the state Governor isn't doing anything about this. Katie Hobbs is a the definition of a DINO

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is this part of the Chinese hoax?

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Check the poster and look at their comments.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago

Can't provide any relief for this. Without an inherent and unrelenting threat to their lives, homeless people would have no motivation to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. /s