this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
843 points (95.5% liked)

politics

25208 readers
2944 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Stuart Colbert 28'! My fingers would break I'd vote so hard for that.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

I'm just saying, his name is spelled correctly right there in the original post... lol

[–] itspuddinthyme90@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Could you imagine those debates?! Pure gold 😂

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 hours ago

I'd normally say "hells no, stop electing celebrities!" but this is a person who is actually politically informed (savvy even) and at this point possibly bthenonoy person why might get the US out of this miserable shit it's in and on to a path towards an actual representative democracy.

If anything, Jon Stewart might be the only person able to get the US to stop electing celebrities in the first place

So yeah, Jon 2028!

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 32 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

A lot of people here are condemning celebrity in US politics, and I get it... but at this point in time we might need someone who is already famous yet consistent and trustworthy. Stewart has shown himself to be a good person for decades. He's also politically informed, progressive, and whip smart.

We need a candidate who wants real change for the betterment of the working class. Somehow people thought that was Trump... I guess because he said he would be, a few times? And people were hoping hard? And not looking at his track record at all? Also racism? More importantly though: people didn't think that candidate was Harris, who got pushed through by the Democratic party and ran an uninspiring campaign. Those people didn't vote. Those people were excited about candidates like Bernie, who's track record on class issues is indefatigable. Those people could potentially be excited about Jon Stewart tearing shit down for the actually betterment of the poor, and might trust that he would try.

That's my read, anyway. A Mamdani could come along and stir up some real enthusiasm, but I think it's harder for a no-name without a proven record to win a national election. Last time that happened we ended up with Obama, and people still feel burned by his lack of progressive action.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Yes please. I've been wanting him to run for decades and I was hoping when he left the daily show he might end up on the path. I know he doesn't want to do it, but no one who SHOULD have the job really WANTS the job, because they know what it means to do that job properly.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The Venn diagram overlap of personality characteristics of modern politicians and celebrities is extraordinarily large. Pure charisma drives success in modern media-driven politics. It's sad, but I believe it's truth now.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

Charisma has always been a major driver of politics, be it Republican Roman, Great Britain during WW2, or now. The only thing that is really different, is that we have better records of what modern politicians get up to. I recommend watching Historia Civilis's coverage on Rome, particularly the "His Year" subseries.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 4 hours ago

Turn it to our advantage ? not USian, but we all have something to lose

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 40 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

Can you stupid fucks stop worshiping celebrities for like FIVE MINUTES.

I don't get how mindless our population is.

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Volodymyr Zelenskyy was a standup comedian and I think he's doing a pretty good job as president.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Well, we've already had Reagan, Schwarzenegger, Jesse Ventura, arguably Al Franken (he was on SNL), not to mention the Cheeto Bandito. Clint Eastwood and even Jerry goddamned Springer both made it as far as mayor. There are probably tons of others I'm forgetting.

So that ship has likely sailed, I'm sorry to say. Too late; we're already stupid.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Springer went the opposite direction. He was a lawyer and a politician, and after his career fizzled, he went into media. He was an actual news anchor before he got a national reputation for hosting a trashy TV show.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Americans dont really know how to judge a persons character... Look at the choices for the last few decades... They have all been horrible people, except maybe Joe Biden who was unable to function instead.

Yes, Jon seems like a good person but I dont think good people are attracted to career politics. Its for the snakes and the lizards.

But yeah, he would be a good fit if he wanted to sacrifice his happiness for that role. I think he is way too smart for that.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

In many ways you NEED a snake or lizard to navigate actual politics. Actual politics is dealing and wheeling and backroom negotiations. It's exerting will and influence and collecting power in the form of favors, voting blocs, coalitions and all manner of social complexity that shrewd, even narcissistic people absolutely exceed at.

This doesn't mean they have to be evil but you have to have someone who naturally enjoys playing dirty or skirting the rules and is capable of self-promotion. Of course Trump is all of these things and why he's been effective at passing policy... stupid, shitty policy, but he has enough political capital that the GOP falls over themselves to suckle at his saggy teets. He's been setting this up for decades.

But what a lot of people who aren't following politics don't realize is Obama and every other president was the same. They were all self-important, hubristic and "scummy" in their own regards.

For example, I don't like Gavin Newsom at all, but he would probably be a highly effective president when it comes to pushing and passing policy. John Stewart might go in with ideals and goals, and get immediately sidelined and made into a lame-duck by not being able to leverage votes in house and senate or being unwilling to play ball and make sacrifices to get gains later. This is what it means to be an effective president and I don't see anyone really who has both the will and the sauce.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Just an interesting observation I've had about the comments here: everyone against this is misspelling his name

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

Nothing scares the right more than Jon Stewart. He made Tucker Carlson quit his job and stop wearing bow ties, lol.

load more comments
view more: next ›