this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
43 points (97.8% liked)

retrocomputing

5292 readers
30 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some idiot saw this mouse and thought “I want to drive one of those”.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 5 points 1 day ago

LOL suddenly I understand why they call it a "tank mouse."

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've just realized that using FPGA for such products is economically sane. I thought before that when they use FPGA for specific end products, that's because of military-like expectation to be able to change everything, or because of lacking effort and aiming for fans.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it's cheaper than fabricating new chip sets, and more accurate than emulation. You can also reprogram them if bugs are found, or you want it to pretend to be a completely different machine. They are ace!