this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
598 points (95.7% liked)

Science Memes

16280 readers
2413 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 30 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Thanks, I hate it. Not because of the hole, but because of how unhealthy the skin looks in this picture.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Scanning electron microscopes image in a vacuum. Nothing looks 100% like it does at sea level when you suck all the air out.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

Pik pik pik

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 23 points 1 week ago

That old familiar sting.

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Most SEMs use a vacuum chamber to get their photos. Also, it's not uncommon to sputter a conductive coating onto the surface you're scanning.

How the hell did they get this photo?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Put a needle in someone, freeze them solid with liquid nitrogen, then take a picture. Throw body out with rest of specimens.

Easy peasy.

[–] Duckingold@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

It likely wasn't done on an electron microscope, or at least there is no reason to. There is no scale bar, but quick look online tells me a very fine needle is about 0.016in. 500x magnification optical lens would give you more than enough resolution for a photo like that.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Probably just a chunk of skin, not a whole person

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They could have remained a portion of the skin. ~~But as another commenter notes, this is too large to need an electron microscope.~~

Edit: then another comment says otherwise, and cites the collection it is from.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

Yes ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] socsa@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

I should also call your mom.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Skin kinda looks like dried up paint (I don't paint). Is this dryer than normal, or?

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

Apparently electron microscopes work in a vacuum. So this is a needle hole in skin, in a vacuum.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Any hole's a goal

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 week ago

...hmmmmmm...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›