this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
278 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

11240 readers
2550 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 92 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] dotslashme 3 points 7 months ago

Came here to make sure this one was in the comments.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 91 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Tech bros will always choose the most overcomplicated option over the simplest, most effective ones.

Why build a battery and just install some more solar panels to charge it during the day when you could have a mirror in orbit beam down a tiny fraction of the light required to generate power anywhere near regular daytime capacity, for only a small portion of the night before the satellite is out of range, in only a small area, in a manner that can only work for one single client per satellite at a time, meaning it gets less cost effective at scale?

[–] Neondragon25@piefed.social 50 points 7 months ago (1 children)

and all of this is localized entirely within your kitchen?

May I see it?

[–] yyyesss@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 7 months ago

name does not check out

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Can you repeat the question?

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 64 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Imagine lying in bed trying to sleep and suddenly it's daylight because your neighbour ordered sunlight on Uber.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 34 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 8 points 7 months ago

Haha, perfect fit 😁

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 54 points 7 months ago (2 children)

These morons are still around? Didn't we thoroughly deal with them the last time their press release made the rounds which was, what, about a year ago?

Don't get too worked up about it. What they're proposing is physically impossible for a myriad of reasons, which anybody who didn't flunk their 10th grade science class would be able to tell you. Once they run out of investors to grift we'll never hear from them again.

There's no loss here other than the waste of money, effort, and rocket fuel.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 7 points 7 months ago

They're going to shine it on the Solar Freakin' Roadways so they can keep producing power at night.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Nah, don't get too worked out over it.

It can't be economically viable either, so as soon as that company stops gifting investors out of their money, it will just disappear and the mirror will fall back into Earth.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I am worried about them screwing it up and having the thing explode in orbit

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome

Ideally the investors figure out what's wrong before the company starts launching mirrors into orbit

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you break a mirror satellite it’s like 10 years of bad luck for the whole planet.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's 6.623 × 10^13 kilometers of bad luck!

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Given the ridiculous financial gymnastics propping up the AI industry, I'm not sure that "not economically viable" is always a failure state for a business any longer.

It hasn't been since at least "too big to fail."

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Which bond film was this again?

[–] Hismama@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] disgrunty@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

I think there was something similar in a Batman film too, the bad one with Arnold Schwarzenegger in it iirc

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

This is literally the opposite of one of the plans to lower global temperatures.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 7 months ago

Well I heard that you can just order to take down a satellite, so you could do that.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

Does this work as a ping?

@404mediaco@mastodon.social

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 7 months ago

i wouldn't worry about it. The whole business is built on an extremely huge miscalculation.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 7 months ago

This is literally the plot of one of the James bond movies.