this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
413 points (99.0% liked)

politics

25161 readers
3170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“This ban is a massive win for Texas ranchers, producers, and consumers,” Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller said in a statement following the bill’s passage. “Texans have a God-given right to know what’s on their plate, and for millions of Texans, it better come from a pasture, not a lab. It’s plain cowboy logic that we must safeguard our real, authentic meat industry from synthetic alternatives.”

...

Texas joins Indiana, Mississippi, Montana and Nebraska in enacting new laws this year; Alabama and Florida did so last year. In March, the Oklahoma House approved a similar bill that did not advance out of the Senate this session.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 hours ago

Pretty sure beans are 1000% a bigger threat to ranchers.

[–] pheggs@feddit.org 23 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, I am all in for labeling, but banning it? Is that what's happening? why would anyone do that

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Protectionism for meat companies is why.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

If the meat companies had any sense, they'd be pushing for and funding it. That much moneyh and not owning the competition is just flat out stupid.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

Exactly, they would profit more from planting whatever crop is needed to supply raw materials to the lab-grown facility, than the efficiency loss of raising cattle for protien

That's the thing. It's too late for them to get in on the real ground floor. The tech is already basically here with increasingly well established companies. Now the cheapest best optionfor the old meat companies to stay competitive is to try to block the new competition. Of course that method won't hold up long term but we all know shareholders only care about next quarter.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 12 points 10 hours ago

Regulatory capture in action

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 58 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Free market my fucking ass

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

You are free to bribe a politician and influence the market all you want /s

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Freedom to fuck over certain groups of people who threaten their power. So brave.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago

Feels kinda unconstitutional to me. They could say you can't sell it for consumption, but not sell it at all seems like an overstep.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Why won't anyone let the market decide?!? 😭

[–] dink@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

It's about control, they don't want us deciding anything.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 25 points 20 hours ago

The SmAlL gOvErNmEnT GOP, playing favorites and legislating in favor of one of the unhealthiest, ecologically devastating industries on the planet... But their voters will keep voting for the corruption!

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans are not fit to govern.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

The only place conservatives fit is in a box six feet under ground.

[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

More freedumb.

[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Easiest solution? Spread those ticks that give meat sensitivity around

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Where? Barely two blades of grass still standing in this state that haven't been paved over.

[–] xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 day ago

Lab grown meat is a dead meme imo but acting like Texan beef comes from grass fed cows in pastures and not from hellish factory farms where they get fed corn until their liver dies sure sounds stupid

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Texans have a God-given right to know what’s on their plate

This sounds a lot like anti-vaxxing, where people want to "know" what's in their vaccine. Like it's a conspiracy.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

If only Texans could read (labels) they would know instantly. The end of the quote is the real focus: they want to protect the ranching industry by killing competition from plant based products.

[–] DarthFreyr@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I bet the lab folks could tell you what's in their product much better than ranchers and meat processing factories ever could. A lot of science goes into it though and some people seem to be allergic to that, at least based on the sorts of claims they make.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Yes, that’s basically the idea, I guess.

Like with vaccines.

It doesn’t fit in a Tweet though.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need to be funding this stuff.

Move all meat subsidies into lab-grown meat to save animals and still have meat. Easy.

Everybody trying to act like it's bad is lying and likes animals getting hurt.

[–] the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

It's just plain cowboy logic!

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What company do I invest in to support this?

This will be bigger than legal weed and the idiot states banning it are showing us yet again how fucking stupid they are.

Edit

Upside Foods, but ANIC , AGNMF, and CULTF are the investing groups.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago (27 children)

I'm pretty sure this is a huge self own and in a decades time Texans who enjoy knowing what's on their plate will be envious of their interstate bretheren enjoying tastier healthier cuts at a reduced price.

I'm pretty sure this is a huge self own

Congratulations, you understand every Texas legislative session since Ann Richards was governor.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 day ago

yay. let's torture even more animals!

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's about appeasing the rich cattle ranchers, just like their lax environmental and zoning laws for oil and industry. The gulf of Mexico around Texas is extremely polluted.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Well not really. Beef production is not a significant industry in Texas, and its generally known more for sheep than cattle.

But beef is "manly" and so fuckwit dumb failed lawyers, who would squeal at the sight of a shovel, boast about supporting it.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Google AI awnser

Texas leads the United States in cattle production, holding the top spot for beef cows and overall cattle inventory. In 2024, Texas had 4,075,000 beef cows, accounting for 14.62% of the U.S. total, according to the National Beef Wire. Texas also ranks first in the number of all cattle and calves, with 12.2 million head. This represents a significant portion of the U.S. cattle population, with Texas alone accounting for 14% of the total. Here's a breakdown of Texas meat production by numbers:

Beef Cows: 4,075,000 (January 1, 2025)
Cattle & Calves: 12.2 million head
Percentage of U.S. Beef Cow Inventory: 14.62%
Economic Impact: Cattle are Texas's biggest agricultural commodity, with a market value of $15.5 billion in 2022.
Commercial Red Meat Production (2017): 397.3 million pounds
Hog Inventory (December 2024): 1,170,000
Goat Inventory (January 1, 2025): 22,000
Sheep & Lamb Inventory (January 1, 2025): 670,000
Broiler Production (Head): 727,500,000 

Texas's dominance in cattle production significantly contributes to the state's economy and the overall U.S. beef supply.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Texans have a God-given right to know what’s on their plate...

If this was about knowing you would have been passing labeling laws.

...and for millions of Texans, it better come from a pasture, not a lab.

You don't need a law to stop people who already don't want to do something. This isn't for millions of Texans it's for a few rich assholes who want to shut down competition.

It’s plain cowboy logic that we must safeguard our real, authentic meat industry from synthetic alternatives.”

If we're talking about the kind of cowboys that get a corrupt government to back them up as they crush their rivals and bleed the people dry, then sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I still really want to get off this ride... i have been over it for a long time.

Fuck stupid people.

Fuck them in their stupid asses!

load more comments
view more: next ›