this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
569 points (99.5% liked)

News

31513 readers
2390 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Air Force said Thursday it would deny all transgender service members who have served between 15 and 18 years the option to retire early and would instead separate them without retirement benefits. One Air Force sergeant said he was “betrayed and devastated” by the move.

The move means that transgender service members will now be faced with the choice of either taking a lump-sum separation payment offered to junior troops or be removed from the service.

An Air Force spokesperson told The Associated Press that “although service members with 15 to 18 years of honorable service were permitted to apply for an exception to policy, none of the exceptions to policy were approved.” About a dozen service members had been “prematurely notified” that they would be able to retire before that decision was reversed, according to the spokesperson who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal Air Force policy.

A memo issued Monday announcing the new policy, which was reviewed by the AP, said that the choice to deny retirement benefits was made “after careful consideration of the individual applications.”

All transgender members of the Air Force are being separated from the service under the Trump administration’s policies.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 216 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

The cruelty is the point.

Fuck every idiot who voted for this.

There is a Hell and we are living in it.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This isn't just cruelty

You don't want trans people actively in your military when the insurrection starts.

The expediency here should make it clear how fast paced the plans are.

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Well trump and screw have to do everything and kick off any plans before the term limit hits. If things haven't been started by then it becomes a lot more complicated.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I hope I live long enough to see every idiot who enabled this shit standing in front of Nuremberg 2

[–] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

I agree that all guilty of treason. Not to mention really shitty people.

Imagine having 18 years in, just about to retire with full pension and this happens. Talk about radicalized.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Has anybody in Nuremberg 1 been punished for crimes against their own population?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

He was punished later.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Honestly same, but there's plenty enough of them for both

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

it's not just cruelty it's the subtle (hell at this point not so subtle) hints that "we need to surround ourselves with loyalists to OUR cause, not the country" Because when the squads start rolling out to not just detain people but to line them up on the street probably not the best idea to have transgender/gay/people of color on the other side of the trigger.

the shit is coming, and soon. ICE is now recruiting teens as an obvious scapegoat for one slipped trigger finger.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

They're still building hell

We don't have to live in it

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What if we were unknowingly in hell?

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Then you have nothing to lose.

Grab a Molotov

Probably head to the Winchester and wait for it all to blow over

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"sepersted from the service"

You mean fired due to discrimination?

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago

They're after the wrong 1%

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 136 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This is the same old shit and gay people will be next followed by people of color.

I was in when they ended don't ask, don't tell. There was a person in for 19 years. Openly gay. So much so, they would take other shipmates to gays bars with them all the time. It was never a secret.

I assume you are asking the obvious question "19 years?" Someone reported them to the command and they kicked them out before reaching 20 years. Fucking less than honorable discharge. Fuck any one that calls them self a vet/member of any branch and supports this shit. You are no brother or sister of mine. If I seen you bleeding out, I would frag your ass.

A lot I can understand but you take an oath to support your family in arms. Hegseth is a GOD DAMN traitor to his country and the service.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

"Suckers and losers"

-The Current Commander in Chief-

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They took an oath to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. They abandoned their oath and are now suffering the penalties of being an oathbreaker.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Real life isn't like movies, "oaths" don't mean anything than gloifying a few lines of words. I mean, when has anyone in a position of power ever took their oaths seriously?

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Yes. Absolutely yes. But with consequences.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 11 points 3 days ago

That shit pissed me off. He was denied a military pension by some fucking bigot.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump is a bigger traitor and people voted him for commander in chief. Americans be weird.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago

I expect nothing less from Commander in chief bone spurs. Vance and Hegseth served. They are suppose to help their brothers and sisters in arms. Not shoot them in the back.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 59 points 3 days ago

Social conservatives are a hateful people. Bitter and hateful. They’re the bad guys of the world.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 90 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't join the armed forces, the government does not give a shit about veterans

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Republicans especially don't care about veterans or active duty

And it’s absolutely insane how they can get away with all the “rah rah troops” bullshit when they are violently and demonstrably against any part or context of the military outside of the concept of “do exactly what the fuck I say” - by which I mean the existence and exploitation of its inherent ironclad chain of command.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 68 points 3 days ago (1 children)

30% of federal employees are also veterans and they've been getting fucked all year.

There's countless stories. They do not give a shit about you. YOU is YOU. Everyone. These greedy fuckers. DO. NOT. CARE. ABOUT. YOU.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 3 days ago

the gop NEVER DID, and never will. its all performative politics. im guessing rural ones still support these parasites.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 55 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If I had served in the military and this was how I was treated on the way out, I'd probably use my training to do my best to inflict harm on the decision-makers.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if this has any connection to the sargeant who shot up Fort Stewart?

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Unlikely. That guy was in a different branch of service (Army) and he hadn't been in long enough to be directly affected anyway.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 3 days ago

Thanks, I haven't heard anything else about that than the initial report.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This has to be grounds for a lawsuit.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Maybe if the judiciary system would be fair, non-political and not corrupt. However....

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 days ago

i guess you never got the memo. drumpf doesn't give a fuck about lawsuits or courts.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago

That is some super dishonorable shit.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 days ago

Air force report in January 2026: Because of no reasons whatsoever, there has been a surge in fragging incidents and former military involved mass shootings. For that reason, we are banning all members of the military who do not possess certain genetic attributes.

Heil trump.