this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
133 points (99.3% liked)

Programming

22134 readers
29 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
UlrikHD@programming.dev
133
A new worst coder has entered the chat: vibe coding without code knowledge (stackoverflow.blog)
submitted 6 days ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hoimo@ani.social 82 points 6 days ago (4 children)

This, I think, is the real promise of vibe coding tools—that you can learn how to code without a CS degree.

I learned to code without a CS degree. I used a for Dummies book, W3schools, Stack Overflow and the good guidance of a senior developer. Learning to code was never the issue. And I think poking around in the code, experimenting, stumbling on unrelated but helpful answers, before finding your problem, are all great ways to become experienced that are prevented by the use of a tool like Bolt. If Bolt produces code that confuses experienced developers, how is the vibe coder supposed to learn anything useful from it?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Indeed. A huge proportion of Gen X professionals were self taught children who learnt on home computers and then grew up.

CS degrees don't teach you how to code. They teach you computer science.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I'm in this picture! Started taking Harvard's free CS50 class and quickly bailed, didn't want to learn actual computer science.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I learned to program by shitting out God awful shell scripts that got gently thrashed by senior devs. The only way I've ever learned anything is by having a real-world problem that I can solve. You absolutely do NOT need a CS degree to learn software dev or even some of compsci itself, and I agree that tools like Bolt are going to make shit harder. It's one thing to copy stack overflow code because you have people arguing about it in the comments. You get to hear the pros and cons and it can eventually make sense. It's something entirely different when an LLM shits out code that it can't even accurately describe later.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Or that it can produce repeatedly. That's something that bothers me. Slight changes in the prompt and you get a wildly different result. Or, worse, you get the same bad output every time you prompt it.

And then there are the security flaws

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

You can use that to your advantage! Slight prompt changes can give you different ideas on how to proceed, give you some items to evaluate. But that's all they're good for, and while they can be solid on getting you past a block, I'm horrified to think anyone in the IT space thinks an LLM can output safe, working code.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

LLMs are great for getting around specific stumbling blocks, might even present a path you hadn't thought of or knew about. And that is it. Stop right there and you'll be fine.

I completely understand how an ignorant bystander would believe AIs pump out working code. I cannot understand anyone with any experience thinking that.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago

just python and looking up every single thing i want the code to do "python print text"
"python get input"
"python loops"
"python iterate through list"

and this is why i'm such a diehard python shill, it doesn't require you to write 5 billion lines of boilerplate code to print some fucking text, it's very approachable.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

To be fair, in the quoted passage the author is explicitly not referring to Bolt, but asking for explanations of specific, probably small scope issues from non-agentic AI tools.

Personally even while in school for CS I spent a large number of hours staring at a screen being totally unsure how to proceed to figure out what I didn't understand, most of it trivial details, or making random edits and hoping it would fix something. I'm sure there are advantages to learning by stumbling around, but I really don't think it's the ideal way unless you're already a very methodically curious person.

The temptation to jump directly to asking the AI to just do everything for you without yourself understanding it is definitely going to be a stumbling block for people learning, and I'm not sure if there's a good way around that one, but otoh something available 24/7 that can mostly accurately answer beginner questions in context and as you have worded them seems like it would be crazy helpful, so many times I just wasn't able to progress until I could get some attention from someone.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

AI: for expert novices.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is the endgame, isn't it? Just a matter of time.

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 20 points 6 days ago

No, nothing would change: those who can't code will continue to not coding or write some useless gibberish.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

am I missing it or did they not actually post the link to their github?

edit: the link to github has been added. https://github.com/bunnywapen/dont-go-in-there