this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2277 readers
77 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

no mouse, no keyboard, no user

[–] shads@lemy.lol 12 points 3 months ago

Those annoying things that just go on and on about wanting to talk to a real person and expecting their software to fulfil their needs instead of Satyas personal vision? Cut em loose we don't need em!

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago

Yet somehow, users money.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago

Well no more pebkac at least

[–] rauls5@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 months ago

Fuck. Microsoft.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This really ignores that a vast majority of people appreciate some tactility and feedback on what they do. Millions if not billions of dollars have been spent researching the proper feedback to provide to users. I admit some workflows can be overly clumsy or burdensome, but even assuming AI functioned correctly and did the things it's supposed to this is still incredibly delusional.

I mean, I don't expect anything from Microsoft anymore, but the disconnect here between what they are attempting to promise and what people even want is growing at alarming levels.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You mean you are not excited about gaming with voice prompts?

Me: "run forward but not too fast. Aim at the balls and shoot just before it attacks you back and then reload and turn left while crunching."

AI: According to Wikipedia, to run forward but not too fast is considered a fallacy. A better way to say it would be "Sprint forward while accelerating"

The future will be fun!

[–] ThunderComplex@lemmy.today 12 points 3 months ago

"Aim at the balls”
“I’m sorry, this request is against content guidelines so I cannot comply”

[–] HedyL@awful.systems 11 points 3 months ago

To me, this sounds like the fantasy of slave ownership all over again. They wouldn't demand exact written orders, either.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah remember paperless offices, cant stop the future.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My last office was almost paperless! When I started I was inventorying the IT infrastructure and asked about printers. "Meh, there's one over there, think it still works."

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The early paperless offices were 'paper is explicitly banned'. It was really weird, and they seemed so proud.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Never worked in one but I remember the hype!

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 10 points 2 months ago

You can pry my CORDED mouse and keyboard from my cold, dead hands.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

good luck using vim wo a keyboard

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kai Lentit: Senior Engineer Uses vim Via Voice Control

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

hah reminds me of the emacs one. That would be good.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

How about go fuck your self? Fix AI properly and then we talk.