this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2112 readers
98 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 9 points 6 days ago

You can pry my CORDED mouse and keyboard from my cold, dead hands.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

no mouse, no keyboard, no user

[–] shads@lemy.lol 12 points 1 week ago

Those annoying things that just go on and on about wanting to talk to a real person and expecting their software to fulfil their needs instead of Satyas personal vision? Cut em loose we don't need em!

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

Yet somehow, users money.

Well no more pebkac at least

[–] rauls5@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago

Fuck. Microsoft.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This really ignores that a vast majority of people appreciate some tactility and feedback on what they do. Millions if not billions of dollars have been spent researching the proper feedback to provide to users. I admit some workflows can be overly clumsy or burdensome, but even assuming AI functioned correctly and did the things it's supposed to this is still incredibly delusional.

I mean, I don't expect anything from Microsoft anymore, but the disconnect here between what they are attempting to promise and what people even want is growing at alarming levels.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean you are not excited about gaming with voice prompts?

Me: "run forward but not too fast. Aim at the balls and shoot just before it attacks you back and then reload and turn left while crunching."

AI: According to Wikipedia, to run forward but not too fast is considered a fallacy. A better way to say it would be "Sprint forward while accelerating"

The future will be fun!

[–] ThunderComplex@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago

"Aim at the balls”
“I’m sorry, this request is against content guidelines so I cannot comply”

[–] HedyL@awful.systems 10 points 1 week ago

To me, this sounds like the fantasy of slave ownership all over again. They wouldn't demand exact written orders, either.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah remember paperless offices, cant stop the future.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My last office was almost paperless! When I started I was inventorying the IT infrastructure and asked about printers. "Meh, there's one over there, think it still works."

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The early paperless offices were 'paper is explicitly banned'. It was really weird, and they seemed so proud.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Never worked in one but I remember the hype!

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago
[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

How about go fuck your self? Fix AI properly and then we talk.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

good luck using vim wo a keyboard

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Kai Lentit: Senior Engineer Uses vim Via Voice Control

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

hah reminds me of the emacs one. That would be good.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 week ago

Vision 2025 no microshit and no Google running any of devices on my house.

Even tech illiterates seem fine jerk their laptops with Linux on, very happy with the battery "upgrade" too 🤣