this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
123 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

73758 readers
4297 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The board determined the primary contributing factors were OceanGate’s inadequate design, certification, maintenance and inspection process for the Titan. Other factors cited in the report include a toxic workplace culture at OceanGate, an inadequate domestic and international regulatory framework for submersible operations and vessels of novel design, and an ineffective whistleblower process under the Seaman’s Protection Act.

The board also found OceanGate failed to properly investigate and address known hull anomalies following its 2022 Titanic expedition. Investigators determined the Titan’s real-time monitoring system generated data that should have been analyzed and acted on during the 2022 Titanic expedition. However, OceanGate did not take any action related to the data, conduct any preventative maintenance or properly store the Titan during the extended off season before its 2023 Titanic expedition.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I recently watched the Netflix documentary about the Titan. Stockton Rush's sheer level of hubris is just mind blowing. Not only thinking he knew better than engineers who design submersibles for a living, but willfully disregarding a century of well established engineering standards in favor of his stupid ass ideas.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It absolutely blew my mind how many times he clearly heard the carbon fiber cracking under the pressure yet constantly explained it away as not a big deal. And despite having acoustic sensors meant to identify when that cracking was likely to be a major problem he ignored that as well.

IKR? It doesn't take a genius or even an engineering degree to figure out that if you're inside a vessel under intense pressure and that vessel is made of a bunch of fibers that are glued together, cracking sounds are no bueno.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I for one blame the anti science culture that first was tolerated, but lately, celebrated.

Exhibit a: oceangate Exhibit b: the entire US government (pay special attention to RFK) Exhibit c: is it even needed at this point?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, but "do your own research"

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Good thing he’s anomalous among billionaires!

Edit: was*

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Move fast, ~~break things~~ kill people.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 15 points 3 days ago

Including himself. If I had to find some respect for the guy, the fact he risked his own life might be it...

Fortunately, I don't have to. What an idiot.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

ineffective whistleblower process

Yeah good luck with that in the new USA where whistleblowers can go blow a whistle, if you know what I mean

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] nagaram@startrek.website 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I always am shocked at how detailed the reports are, but I imagine they have to legally record and report on absolutely everything they found even if its irrelevant.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It's like any science, and even law, we're trying to be very clear, exact, and specific with language that has evolved to express emotions and hyperbole.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Yep, it imploded. Simply too much water, in the end."

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago

They even got an expert from IGN. "7.8, too much water."