My company is experimenting with using LLMs for yearly reviews and it works just like this. We feed in some bullet points of accomplishments and hope the LLM doesn’t fuck it up. Then the manager gets a condensed version down from the summaries.

Like why bother have the llm in the middle? Can’t I just send data?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some of the bullet points are outright wrong.

Some of the bullet points are misleading.

The reader would have been better off with the initial list.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, but then how would the journalist keep up the appearance of being a serious intellectual who writes in long form?

Like, I unironically would love that, but it's culturally difficult right now.

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is there anything that generates half-way decent UIs? All I‘ve used was pretty much trash.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

humans, sometimes

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Eh, it's hit or miss in my experience.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

It's all trash

[–] embMaster@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Qwen3 Coder 480B actually gave me some pretty impressive results.