this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
732 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

16103 readers
2826 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

1

2

3

4

Wait… 3-2-1-4 ahhh

[–] alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 183 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

I hate the reading order of Twitter.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

So do I

Yes

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 27 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't it

3

2

1

4

in this example?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 12 hours ago

Yes, because there is a screenshot in one of the tweets.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's like the word balloons in a comic book. You just kinda work out the order via context.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago

In comics there's variation on common forms but most have set sequences that just may vary between countries because of the directions of reading. Lots of manga even have the authors preferred style described at the start of the book now.

[–] Johandea@feddit.nu 83 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

~~I~~ hate ~~the reading order of~~ Twitter.

There! Much better!

[–] alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Haha you are correct! I hate everything about it, including the reading order.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I 'ate its fur, I 'ate its guts, and I 'ate the way it's always barking!

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 24 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Agreed. The microblogging format is more for one-way communication (i.e. 1 poster to many viewers). Trying to have a discussion or even just reading a discussion on twitter, mastodon, etc. is a terrible experience.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 15 hours ago

Yeah Blue Sky is a pain in the ass too. If you go to the comments of a post, there's no way to collapse a thread. So it's just:

Main post

  • Top comment
    • A
    • Million
    • Fucking
    • Worthless
    • Replies
    • You
    • Can't
    • Collapse
[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 9 points 15 hours ago

It’s designed for soap boxing

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 56 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

There's a Disco Elysium joke here, but I can't think of how to phrase it. Just pretend I made a perfectly worded reference.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

damn, that was a nice reference to the disco elysium video game

[–] kaklerbitmap@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Sick reference bro

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

“Incredible. A new species. The chitinous shell, the impossibly long legs, the delicate, veined wings folded tight against its back. It is a creature unlike any you’ve ever seen, a marvel of evolutionary design. The scientific community will be astounded. Your name will be etched into the annals of entomology. You lean in closer, notebook and pen at the ready, to jot down the physical characteristics. And that’s when it hits you. It… it looks exactly like a stick. The profound truth, ugly and unshakeable, settles in your guts like a stone. Of course, you didn’t find it. Nobody found it. You were just the first one to stop and stare long enough to realize that the stick wasn’t a stick.”

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 hours ago

PATTERN RECOGNITION [Legendary: Failure] Huh, weird stick.. Anyways let's go get dinner.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I immediately thought of the Phasmid too! So this is me catching your perfectly worded reference and making a sly reply to let you know I’m in on the joke and we are both very cool for having encountered that piece of media.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 47 points 22 hours ago
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 50 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Just another example of entomologists withholding crucial information about the bug kingdom from us, who do they work for anyways? The humans or the bugs?

What if there are EVEN bigger bugs out there entomologists just conveniently haven't told us about yet...?

Think TREEbug not Stickbug.

The end is near and it is segmented into three main body sections!!

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

you know trees?

👀

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 27 points 22 hours ago

Legend has it there are beetles out there big as a Volkswagen.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

sounds like they’re working for big bug

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Imagine a 15 inch chocolate coated stick bug. You can't just get those anywhere. This is hidden information. Boycott bug and all it's bullshit.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

as in Nibbles Woodaway?

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It says a lot about your stick emulation if you elude discovery that long. It has achieved peak stickness.

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 22 hours ago

Pure stickcellence

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 20 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I bet indigenous peoples knew about it at certain points.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"A new species discovered" means "hey, we noticed nobody ever catalogued that one!"

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah! And, I don't even necessarily mean to discount ignoring indigenous folks, which definitely can be a thing, but it really really does come down to sometimes folks just don't write it down. I've seen a video (I wanna say a Smarter Everyday video) where they were in some South American jungle/rain forest or whatever and they very casually shine a light at a cloth to get moths to land on it, and they found like one or two new species.

[–] Tomassci@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Wasn't that Standupmaths?

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Indigenous People: "Hello? Why hey, strangers, who are-"

Capt. Cook or some shit: "Hey there, you fellas good at working? Like, lots of manual labor?"

Indigenous People: "uhh... Wut?"

Capt Cook: "F it. Take the women, take their food, burn the rest."

Indigenous People: "Bro, hold up, we got this bug that looks like a sti-"

Capt Cook: "BURN IT ALL. NOW!"

Indigenous People: He'll never know about that really big F'in stick bug!

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Captain Christopher Cooklumbus: "You don't want to work, huh? How about if we cut off your hands?"

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 37 minutes ago

"I mean, it's not like you're using them anyway? Amiright?"

[–] oce@jlai.lu 23 points 22 hours ago

I heard it was discovered many times but it did not stick.

[–] winkly@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

What’s brown and sticky?

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

A stick!

Rip

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago