this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
108 points (98.2% liked)

World News

48917 readers
1643 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"A zoo in Denmark has appealed to the public to donate their healthy unwanted pets as part of a unique effort to provide food for its predators."

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoRamyunForYou@lemmy.nz 17 points 21 hours ago

Honestly, I firmly believe we need some type of control on who can have pets.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Curious how some people lose their shit over this but don't see the problem in eating meat

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Because people develop emotional attachments to pets, but not (usually) to livestock.

[–] Renohren@lemmy.today 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

But it's not cats or dogs they are asking for, it's rabbits and chickens... Pets you can find in any supermarket.

[–] CrazyHorse@lemmy.cafe 1 points 19 hours ago

The pictures of chickens, rabbits, pigs, and cows in the supermarket always show them smiling, which makes it seem like they’re happy to be eaten.

[–] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 5 points 17 hours ago
[–] aislopmukbang@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is too complicated for me. Fuck you OP now I'm going to be thinking about this for the next week.

This is essentially asking people to donate their pets to feed to other pets. But how does that differ from offering livestock aside from people that are not farmers having had them?

Also interested in why people wouldn't want the healthy pets. And the word pet is loaded, for me it comes with a promise of a good life and if you are donating a perfectly healthy animal that is not it.

[–] RedIce25@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

When I hear pet I think family member, but I guess it's better than what a lot of people do like abandoning/killing their unwanted pets in inhumane ways.

[–] Plantfoodclock@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At the very least, it's not a live feeding. I personally couldn't do that myself, even though it's a natural process and normal enrichment for many animals.

I personally can't criticize too harshly on the zoo though. At the end of the day, zoos aren't generally money makers (to the best of my knowledge) and their animals need to be cared for. If anything, I'm more judgmental of owners who may willingly donate healthy pets (perhaps those with unhealthy or close to death pets are more understandable).

I do wonder if this some kind of publicity stunt. It has to be cheaper and easier just to get cash donations for livestock right? Less costs for euthanasia and you can buy in bulk. I'm sure they wouldn't say no to free food for their animals but it feels like a weird angle to draw attention to the zoo. Maybe some of this nuance is lost in translation between Dutch and English news media.

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe some of this nuance is lost in translation between Dutch and English news media.

You mean Danish news media?

[–] Plantfoodclock@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Yeah my bad, that's what I get for writing comments after working till midnight.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

Fuck em, go to Givskud zoo near Billund instead.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

That sounds like it's ok to get a pet even if you don't want to take care of it for long. You can then just donate it and feel great about yourself. How about appealing to the public to not adopt/buy pets if they're not sure they want to take the responsibility of taking care of them.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In unrelated news, I am requesting donations of predators from zoos that are unable to adequately feed so that I can use their carcasses to fertilize the garden in which I grow greens for my bunnies.

I have a duty to mimic the natural feeding patterns of rabbits, and greens fertilized in this manner are one way of accomplishing this

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago

In this thread

🤯...🤯...🤯🤯...🤯