this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
198 points (99.0% liked)

politics

25168 readers
2242 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

JB Pritzker said lawmakers are ‘doing the right thing’ after a group left Texas to prevent House vote on redistricting

The Illinois governor, JB Pritzker, has vowed to protect the Democratic members of the Texas house of representatives who left the state in an attempt to block Republican efforts to redraw Texas’s congressional maps.

“We’re going to do everything we can to protect every single one of them and make sure that – ’cause we know they’re doing the right thing, we know that they’re following the law,” Pritzker said at a press conference on Sunday in Illinois alongside some of the the Texas Democratic lawmakers.

The Texas Democrats fled the state on Sunday in an effort to prevent the Texas house from reaching the quorum on Monday needed to vote on a newly proposed congressional map.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I think every accusation is a confession is a serious heuristic so when Abbott says Democrats are receiving bribes my reaction is to wonder who is paying Republicans. Republicans openly admitted to taking bribes, in their own special way, and I know others are paying attention too.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Good start (and infinitely better than the "then we're gonna do our own gerrymander!" bullshit NY and CA Dems are apparently contemplating), but if you really feel an obligation to protect Texans you should start warming people up to the idea of having a coalition of blue state governments send their troopers into Texas to depose the tyrants an re-establish democracy, because that's what this is gonna take

[–] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

That's one way to start a second civil war...

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Illinois Governor isn't going to be doing anything... The warrant is only valid within Texas. They're not going to come to Illinois to kidnap them.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume Abbot won't send Texas Rangers to Illinois.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

They will have to go through the White Sox and Cubs first though.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fuck yeah, so proud of pritzker. When America truly becomes great again... When the gallows are built and the nooses hung. When we start lining up the few thousand billionaire shit bags that thought they were different, and better than everyone else. Pritzker won't be among them. Neither will Taylor Swift, or the Ben and Jerry's owners

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ben & Jerry’s, the brand, is owned by multinational conglomerate Unilever. Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield sold it in 2000. Ben remained active on the board after the sale, and both are known to take political positions that Unilever management would prefer they not.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Actually, the former owners of Ben & Jerry's are suing Unilever for violating the terms of the 2000 merger agreement. The original agreement created an independent board with ""primary responsibility for Social Mission Priorities and the Essential Integrity of the Brand." Unilever has been violating that agreement [Shocked Pikachu Face] by silencing their support for Palestinian refugees and other causes.

The Vermont-based company and five directors of its independent board originally sued Unilever and its U.S. subsidiary, Conopco, in federal court in November 2024, alleging the companies had silenced its attempts to show public support for Palestinian refugees, among other causes.

Ben & Jerry's said those actions violate its 2000 merger agreement, which created the independent board and gave it "primary responsibility for Social Mission Priorities and the Essential Integrity of the Brand." The company has a well-documented history of outspoken advocacy, supporting causes from racial and climate justice to campaign finance reform through what it calls its "progressive, nonpartisan social mission."

In an amended complaint filed in the Southern District of New York on Tuesday, Ben & Jerry's accused Unilever of continuing to censor its social media posts — including about Black History Month and free speech — and waging a "campaign of professional reprisals" culminating in the abrupt removal of its CEO.

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 17 points 1 week ago

good. Pritzker can be decent when it counts. i don't live in IL but i'm not far either. seems better than my governor.