this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
481 points (98.8% liked)

politics

25084 readers
2144 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.is/ksXfx

The Department of Homeland Security is looking to boost its deployment of the military on the streets of the U.S. in order to help carry out Donald Trump’s immigration policies, according to a leaked memo written by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s brother.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Will the troops start to goose step? Which version, Russian or German?

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 49 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 16 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Dude if they do that, conservatives will start bullying people for NOT being pedophiles.

By which I mean

Trump is god almighty -> What Trump does is holy -> Trump is a pedophile -> Everyone must fuck kids or otherwise they're the Antichrist and hate children.

[–] TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Give children the love they deserve! Nothing says loving your child like molestation and rape!

/s for anyone that needs clarity

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Unsarcastically, more and more scholars are recognizing that in the Greek original texts of the New Testament, the apostles seem to range in age from newly pubescent (John) up to maybe 18-19 in the case of Peter. To say nothing of the naked child Jesus was caught with in the garden of Gethsemane (Mark 14:51-52) - the whole reason they crucified him under laws reserved for child traffickers.

Important to remember that Jesus spoke Greek and lived in the context of Greco-Roman culture, with the widespread prevalence of pederasty, eunuchs, drug use etc. that came with it.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Mark 14:61 calls out blasphemy as the charge. Is blasphemy typically the charge used against child traffickers?

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Mark 14:48 has Jesus asking the soldiers why they're attacking him with heavy weaponry as if he were a lēstēs, or human trafficker, the same word is used by Julius Caesar to describe the people who captured and ransomed him, so the general translation of lēstēs as robber or brigand is insufficient, they are human traffickers, often the pederastic type. Caesar also started the tradition of crucifying this particular type of criminal.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Ugh, definitely one of those passages where the translation matters. Several versions of the Bible are no where near suggesting the soldiers are attacking him, nor using "lēstēs". Granted the Bible has been heavily edited over the centuries, and I cannot read the original.

Thank you for pointing out the section.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

To address the passage you mentioned, its Mark 14:64 that mentions blasphemy and that could be (I've heard it explained this way) from Jesus' appropriation of earlier Greek Bacchus/Aphrodite cult practices, with Jesus specifically taking over the role played by Aphrodite.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Will they be dressed in new uniforms with swastikas?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago

Hugo Boss needs to build a few more sweat shops first.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

US flags and unit patches will have to suffice.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget the unironic Punisher logo patches.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago

Punisher skull is the swastika

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 20 points 22 hours ago

"immigration policies"

right.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 143 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Usually this form of dictatorship falls pretty quickly.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It takes a mere handful of decades.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is the reality (look at Russia for those in denial).

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

uh, I'm looking at belarus

[–] sidelove@lemmy.world 106 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wish I had your optimism. It takes work to pull the fucking grubby mitts of authoritarians out of the machine, it doesn't always happen automatically.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The bigger issue is that even if this does collapse quickly, the damage is largely done. Who knows how much data and accumulated years of knowledge are gone, to say nothing of all the agencies and policies that are just burnt to the ground. It took DECADES to get the EPA to even a level that was largely useful. Even if we come out the other side of this, it'll be in a radically changed form, possibly not even as the United States. I can very easily see a power vacuum and federal collapse from the fact that the federal government, aside from the actual levers of power like the judiciary and the military, is just a skeleton now.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

An actually competent government could get the EPA kicking ass, fast. It's absolutely doable. The same group that's motivated enough to fix shit would be likely to keep going and undo damage as fast or faster than it was done.

Talk about plans and options everybody.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Frankly I could see far worse than federal collapse, as in I wouldn't be surprised if some areas devolved into city states at best. The economy is rat fucked to the point where anything coming out the other side that isn't already exceptionally robust is unlikely, which basically is a list of the Western states, North East, and the Mid West Ohio not withstanding.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's what the billionaires want, billionaires can own city-states.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like they're missing the fact that most of them will be wholly irrelevant if USD collapses remember most of them hold their wealth in stocks and the ones who don't have no practical way of enforcing their power. They aren't the patricians of the late Western Roman empire who were both oligarchs and generals with loyal house troops, they are closer to the Italian city state patricians chucking around mercenaries and backstabbing.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They own enough other shit to survive a dollar collapse, they buy up everything they want on the cheap.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Plus the people who are suppose to protect us the people only want to protect the lesser majority that likes to hate, because the protectors are haters also.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 17 points 22 hours ago
[–] Kurious84@lemmings.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These morons are trying to do an authoritarian takeover and will botch the hell out of it but doesn't negate the fact that they are trying.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

All I see is violence ahead.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The younger Hegseth was a podcast producer and social media poster for a conservative think-tank before his brother’s rise from the Fox & Friends Weekend couch to being in charge of the world’s most powerful military.

The USA is looking like a real tin-pot dictatorship these days.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Good thing I have trimmed down my holdings on American stocks.

I hope time proves me wrong, but USA having a violent turmoil is coming.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Not going to happen. The elite have the population by the short and curlies. Nobody wants to do anything cause they'll loose their health care.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

This is absolutely the wrong energy. Stop spreading it. Spreading this crap is what enemies do.

No more.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Nobody wants to do anything cause they'll ~~loose~~ lose their health care.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Most of them already don't have health care. People won't do anything because they want to avoid the concentration camps.

[–] tisktisk@piefed.social 80 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

We are currently clean on OPSEC

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its true, Pete Opsec himself said so in the chat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes, so they can deport a total of 2 people like they did in LA. Waste of money, time, and people's lives.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Sure, but while they’re on these streets, they might as well ensure there’s no illegal immigrants attempting to vote in the midterms. Anybody brown looking in line to vote will need to come to the station for questioning first.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

This is the level of transparency politicians should strive for. The contents of the policies not so much.

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Ah, Mr. Leakseth, what a gift to America.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago

“Due to the sensitive nature of the meeting, minimal written policy or background information can be provided in this briefing memo,” the memo says.

Asked for clarification of the memo’s intentions, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughin declined comment. The New Republic obtained it on the condition that we refrain from posting the original document, so we posted much of the text of it here. We omitted some logistical and biographical details.

https://newrepublic.com/article/198708/trump-military-anti-immigration-dhs-leaked-memo

load more comments
view more: next ›