this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
139 points (97.3% liked)

News

31426 readers
2970 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so that's why our gov is so horny to deregulate this terrible industry. glad our power grid and quality of life is being sacrificed for something so noble

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

When a lot of US politicians suddenly sell a lot of stock is when to get worried. Otherwise they'll keep the zombie alive as long as possible.

There is also the knock-on effect, when AI goes belly up, the tech industry will be stagnant for some time. So many of the tech developments will be hampered.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

It's so much the emperor's new clothes, though. It's not real, it doesn't work how they think or say, it's gunna bust, big time. They've built thier castles on sand.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Tech companies insist they can't afford to give workers raises and lay off employees en masse, yet they're so eager to spend billions of dollars on software they have to give out for free because people don't care enough to pay for it.

Makes total sense.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's an aspect I believe is occurring in the AI data center space that isn't spoken to in the article: Landgrabbing

So many data centers are being stood up now, not because the immediate need for compute exists, but the recognition that there are bad faith players in the data center market space. Regulations largely don't exist to prevent a new DC from being stood up or operated and there are few, if any limits on the power and water consumption these consume. That will change when the infrastructure fixed costs for water and power show up, as well as the regular rise in costs per unit of each on the variable consumption side. If these companies can get their DC approved and built before the regulations exist, or before communities block future buildout, it will be a massive asset for data center operators to prevent new competitors from entering the space.

Further, when the bubble bursts, I think we're going to be in better shape than most bubbles. What is being built is compute infrastructure. Yes, today its being setup for AI use, but there is very little that is AI specific. Meaning, when the bubble bursts, we'll have all this compute (then very cheap to use) as a springboard for the next industry.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes and no.

A lot of the players involved very much DO remember the past few "AI Winters" and know that this tech is going to fail to impress at some point. Hence a push to ramp up with stuff they can repurpose.

But not everyone is Amazon or a good university (professor). There is going to be massive loss of employment as all the people who "know pytorch" have their demand drop to near zero. But we'll also have an entire generation of graduates and grad students who genuinely can't code and MAYBE can call pytorch on their data if they are particular overachievers. And we'll have had years of "Why would I hire a junior level coder when copilot can do that for us? 20 years of experience, minimum." And that is going to be REALLY REALLY hard to recover from.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Its the new "just hire someone overseas" of IT. Just another way to cut costs from hiring actual experts. Some will work, most will not.

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There isn't much in common with a GPU compute datacenter and a software or server compute datacenter besides the power and cooling. These are useless for let's say streaming video or other content hosting.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

These are useless for let’s say streaming video

Great for converting video (something Google does a shitload of), 3D material and fluid simulations (every engineering firm), large scientific projects (BOINC gets most of their compute from donated GPU time), and ray-tracing for movies (animated movies use a shitload of GPU compute).

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We don't need huge portions of our electrical grid dedicated to any of that.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They are almost certainly going to be sold at very, very low rates after the bubble pops. Lots of supply!

Think of it like economic dumping. Going to make it hard for others to compete and anybody who has demand for some of that supply is going to be in great shape!

None of that has anything to do with the associated electrical usage.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

There isn’t much in common with a GPU compute datacenter and a software or server compute datacenter besides the power and cooling.

I'm...not sure you have a good handle on how AWS, GCP, or Azure hyperscaler data centers (which are the type the article is referring to) are set up if this is your take. These services don't sell AI GPU or compute services. Its the whole tip-to-tail of IT servers and services with AI simply being one service offering. GPUs don't exist in as a standalone product. They're installed in compute instances. Even the AI managed service offerings of these hyperscalers are simply compute instances chucked full of GPU with a layer of software abstraction over top of them. You don't need to take my word for it. Its right in the sale pages for the hyperscalers:

Here's GCP:

Compute Engine is GCP's Virtual Machine product. GKE is GCP's Kubernetes (compute container) product.

Here's AWS:

EC2 is AWS's Virtual Machine product. You can see they have many different instance types (VM types) that have GPUs available to them.

GPUs are not sold as a standalone product by these companies. They are sold in concert with the compute products and services.

The possible exception might be Oracle Cloud Infrastructure's (OCI) Supercluster which uses RoCE to stitch together thousands of GPU cores in an AI switched fabric model. source But that is an exception, not the rule. 99% of the AI offerings from these hyperscalers are GPUs stuffed into servers that can be used for regular old non-AI compute needs.

These are useless for let’s say streaming video or other content hosting.

GPUs have been used for General Purpose (GPGPU) computing long before AI took the stage. Nvidia released CUDA, its GPGPU language 18 years ago in 2007.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The AI bubble is so big it's propping up the US yachts (for now). FTFY.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The guy behind this blog wrote a book of the same title and was interviewed on the Better Offline podcast, by Ed Zitrion. He (Ed) also has a newsletter. I recommend checking them out.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

ed zitron is so good

[–] darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine if they spent that money on something worth while. You know like the employees of their own companies that they fired.

[–] Waffle 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think they might get sued because as a publicly traded company they're beholden to shareholders (I agree with you)

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Anyone can sue anyone, but it won't stick in this case because the law would be on the company's side.

There is no general duty to maximize profits. The original court cases are far more nuanced than that. Much is up to the discretion of the company, because of course it is.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gonna push things to the absolute brink of collapse where the only possible way forward will be to finally tax the wealth class heavily and then they still won't do that.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You presume there are levels of societal collapse they wouldn't be willing to accept if it meant people still filtered any amount of cash towards them.

We're rapidly racing towards a Fallout style world where traveling salesmen visit the burnt-out homes full of skeletons to try to find anyone alive to sell the latest Mr Handy model to.