this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
548 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

73655 readers
3877 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No it's not, maybe for some mainstream websites. Saying the "whole internet" is clickbait hyperbole.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Australians will soon be subjected to mandatory age checks across the internet landscape, in what has been described as a huge and unprecedented change.

Search engines are next in line for the same controversial age-assurance technology behind the teen social media ban, and other parts of the internet are likely to follow suit.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-11/age-verification-search-engines/105516256

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The real goal is to eliminate anonymity from the internet.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

It’s about control. They can grant you access or revoke it based on your id.

The powers at be hate that they can’t control the narrative as well as they used to so this is their solution.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

It's fucking ironic that this article is asking me to register just to read it.

Can was please fucking stop needing accounts to exist online? So fucking dumb

[–] ard@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

this is backwards. why can't publishers mark pages as child-friendly and then browsers and operating systems can have a child-friendly mode that parents (or whoever the authoritarians are) can use. Laws can target people misusing the child-friendly mode.

[–] Coil@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It's not about actually protecting children. It's about data.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

This is the correct answer. Notice that they have no compunction about punishing parents who secure gender-affirming care for their trans kids, but there has been zero discussion of holding parents responsible for their kids' internet usage.

Far-right groups in the US have been crying "Big Brother" about everything for years because their whole plan has been to create a surveillance state where to gather information about dissenters. Every accusation is a confession with these people.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

The purpose is to protect the mainstream media.

[–] oozy7@lemmy.world 37 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Remember guys, they cared about the kids and their online safety as soon as Israel started a genocide in Gaza and they lost control of the narrative. But they didn't care at all for the past 20 years when Epstein and his buddies were running rampant.

edit: clarity

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 20 hours ago

Get your coat, we’re leaving.

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 6 points 16 hours ago

Does anyone vaguely remember those internet licenses from that Star Trek DS9 episode when they went back in time but it was the near future from the 80s perspective meaning that it's actually today?

We're going to have internet licenses soon

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

This is why the Dark-web exists.

  • Tor
  • I2P
  • Yggdrasil
  • LokiNet
  • FreeNet
  • ZeroNet
  • GNUnet (In the distant future)

Did I miss anything ?

[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Freenet is now hyphanet, fyi.

[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

No one needs the internet outside of work. The moment I'm forced to show my ID or get my face scanned, I'm done for good.

[–] itslola@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

No one needs the internet outside of work.

As someone with a disability (and no car), the internet has played a massive role in allowing me to live independently, which in turn has a profoundly positive impact on my mental health. There are a wide variety of circumstances in which the internet has enhanced life experience - let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

I don't know what they are thinking, but i protect my ID data more than i protect my credit card data.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If it comes to Lemmy, I quit. I'll go touch grass all day, I don't mind.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I don't see how anybody could come for lemmy. I feel this just attacks centralized services

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 26 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I will move to freenet, i2p and tor

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago

If this happens they should check ID at church too seeing as how children are much more likely to be abused or groomed by someone there.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Time to buy Death Stranding 2 I guess

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 250 points 1 day ago (31 children)

Hell no. Just use decentralized apps, fediverse etc. It's not about "protecting" children. It's about full control and power. So don't give up.

[–] peripheralneuropathy@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

All it takes is one snapshot of legislator's IDs put online to poke a hole into this balloon.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the simulatenous legislaiton from all countries seems very suspicious of a certain foreign adversary backing such motives. this isnt the first things like this happened. just a hunch.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If by "foreign adversary" you mean the US, that might even be true.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago

i2p lemmy is going to be great!

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whever this happens, fuck this shit im out...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›