this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
500 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

12856 readers
962 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oysvendsen@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The Albuquerque Police Department said no charges are expected to be filed against the woman who crashed into VanLandingham.

WTF?!

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

Well, as the article's headline tells us, it was a "bike crash". Probably be charges laid posthumously so that the motorist can sue for civil damages. (Modulo being killed, this happened to someone I know; hit by a car in the bike lane, had to pay for the car's damage.)

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There’s an old joke among American lawyers that if you’re going to murder someone in America, do it with your car. But it’s not really a joke, because the cops will 100% assume it was just an accident, and prosecutors will refuse to bring any charges.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

what happened to the good old man-slaughter which should also apply in cases of accidents

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 11 points 10 hours ago

12 out of 12 jurors will be drivers. They will not convict another driver for being distracted because they also do it all the time. Prosecutors know this and don't wan to waste time on pointless cases.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It's not the driver that kills, it's the car. How are you going to assign man-slaughter charges to an inanimate object?

PS: The inverse is true for guns tho.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it was just a little accident. haven't you ever bumped into someone by mistake before?

jeez, before are so uptight about this, it's not a big deal, just a harmless little accident

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

“Traffic collision”. ‘Accident’ implies no one’s to blame.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

If anything, it was the cyclists/pedestrians fault for traveling unprotected by a car. /s

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 125 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This is infuriating to me. I'm going to include big chunks from the article, because otherwise you won't get the actual picture.

Here is the incident:

Yellow lights flashed on a pole above — fixed alongside bicycle and pedestrian crossing signs — as she biked off the Hahn Arroyo trail and across Carlisle, south of Montgomery, in Northeast Albuquerque. A driver in a blue car slowed to a stop for the 19-year-old as she rolled into the northbound lanes that afternoon.

An SUV in the next lane screeched to a halt, nearly hitting her.

But it was a black Ford Fiesta, in the far right lane, that slammed into VanLandingham — sending her and her bicycle flying through the air.

Here is the legal context:

Burton said the woman was driving 28 mph in the 35 mph zone and told police she didn’t see the flashing yellow lights — although they don’t require drivers to yield, either, according to state statute. Only flashing red lights require drivers to stop and yield to those walking and biking.

“There’s no signage that says that requires a driver to slow, stop, yield right of way — anything,” Burton said of the crossing used by VanLandingham. He said drivers they spoke with had different interpretations of the crossing: some said the lights are always flashing, even with nobody there. Others said they slow down if they see the lights flashing.

The crossing is not considered a marked or unmarked crosswalk despite the signs and lights and, according to the statute, drivers “may proceed through the intersection or pass such a signal only with caution.”

And here are the consequences:

The Albuquerque Police Department said no charges are expected to be filed against the woman who crashed into VanLandingham.

Sgt. James Burton of APD’s Fatal Crash Unit said, “She’s not speeding, she’s not intoxicated, she’s not driving recklessly. We have no proof that she was doing anything distracted in the vehicle, so even if she was, I can’t prove it.”

This is how incredibly fucking bad people are at driving. Even the police can't imagine that seeing people in other lanes slowing down and stopping at a flashing yellow light should be an indication that there might be something to be cautious about.

Even without the yellow flashing lights, if you see people suddenly stopping in other lanes on the road, continuing to drive without slowing down to a near stop seems like completely reckless driving to me, because you can't see through the stopped cars. And if you didn't see the stopped cars, then you must be driving distracted.

And the laws in Albuquerque don't even require drivers to yield at flashing yellow lights? What's the fucking point? That's disgusting.

And let this be a reminder. If you're crossing a road, even if you have the right of way, that won't save you from being killed by a shitty driver.

This is a fucking tragedy, and they're doing nothing about it. Pathetic excuse for a city. The bodies of good intentioned young people will continue to pile up while they sit there and do nothing.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 75 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Burton said the woman (...) didn’t see the flashing yellow lights — although they don’t require drivers to yield, either, according to state statute. Only flashing red lights require drivers to stop and yield to those walking and biking.

“There’s no signage that says that requires a driver to slow, stop, yield right of way — anything,”

Am I getting this right: yellow flashing lights at a crossing, presumably installed officially, are legally meaningless? Isn't putting them there an act of deliberately misleading pedestrians/cyclists then?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 day ago

It’s absolutely insane, that means it’s not a pedestrian crossing it’s a pedestrian trap to bait them into crossing where drivers can legally run them over.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (11 children)

There is a lot of malpractice going on in traffic engineering (I say as a person trained as a traffic engineer). In a sane world, the engineer of record would lose his license for this sort of shit.

[–] PedestrianError@towns.gay 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@A_norny_mousse @logicbomb Every state has some version of duty of care or expectation that a driver maintain control of their vehicle to avoid collisions. Passing stopped cars in two adjacent lanes before hitting the person crossing under a flashing yellow light is definitely an indication of negligence. There was clearly some traffic engineer negligence too, but if police/the DA wanted to at least put a mark on the driver's record for killing the victim, they absolutely could.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 1 day ago

A mark on the record for killing someone seems like a weak response.

They should lose their license and the intersection should be fixed.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Here is the intersection location:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/4uxzNMZbAVDuyrsz5

This type of flashing yellow light does not require drivers to stop, it is just there for warning. My city has been spending (wasting) a huge chunk of its ped "safety" funds on this type of signal. It is a way to make it look like traffic engineers care about ped safety, without doing anything that would actually slow down cars.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nothing scares me more then crossing a strode with these types of signalized lights. Even signalized intersections with more then 2 or more lanes of traffic scare the shit out of me.

This roadway is designed like a hwy and the flashing lights want it to be a street.

This crossway needs to be raised, the stopping point needs to be 2 car lengths back from the crossway. And potentially the roadway need to be shrunk down to one lane with a island in the center if the intention is to turn this strode back into a street.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago

That intersection looks like a nightmare for crossing on foot or bike. It's so flat and open cars are going to want to just gun it.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

I hate this mindset that you have to prove they were distracted

mf the outcome proves that they were not capable of driving safely NO MATTER the reason

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can kill a person and no charges can be raised? This is so dumb....

No sir, I did push that guy from the roof, but you see the pavement killed him! I left him alive and quite excited actually....

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 hours ago

I agree, it's still manslaughter even if it was involuntary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 143 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Teen was third employee of city bike safety center to die in bike crash

Ah yes. It's not that A CAR crashed into her, it was a bike crash.

/s

Awful. Just awful that this keeps happening.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago

Yes, the article confirms all three were killed "by drivers," i.e. in CARS.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah the victim was asking for it riding a bike like that

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Our collective tolerance for driver negligence is literally killing us and most people don't care. In fact, it may as well be on you for choosing to put yourself in harm's way by choosing not to drive a car.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Riding bikes in ABQ is really dangerous, there's not a single sufficient bike lane, and there are multiple bikers in the last decade who have been deliberately ran over by abq drivers.

[–] Eczpurt@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Crazy that on a shitty technicality, the driver did not break any rules...

The crosswalk with the flashing lights is neither marked or unmarked, and drivers are not required to slow down or yield right of way when yellow lights are flashing, only flashing red.

Like sure maybe you don't see lights flashing above you, but maybe pay attention at the road directly in front of you??

There's every excuse to take blame off drivers.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 day ago

In America you can kill randoms with a gun or a car and that's fine.

That's no good.

[–] Midnight_Oil@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I live in Albuquerque and the drivers are by far the worst compared to anywhere I've ever lived. There's no enforcement as APD doesn't want to "deal with it" anymore. Our current mayor pretends it's fine. When I talk to burqueños about it they agree that it's terrible but I get the sense that no one actually cares. To me, drivers have gotten worse since the pandemic and no one wants any kind of enforcement. It's infuriating. These deaths are so pointless and easily preventable.

I love biking but can't here for fear of being run over like this.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I used to live in Albuquerque. One night my friend and I got t-boned by a Lincoln Continental that ran a red light at 50+ mph. The driver pulled into a convenience store parking lot on the corner and asked some random bystander if we were OK (they said "how the fuck would I know?") while tossing empty beer bottles from her car into the trash. Meanwhile we were unconscious in our car on the front lawn of somebody's house. The driver drove off before the cops and ambulance got there, although witnesses were able to take down her license plate.

My friend and I were somehow only bruised (thank you Subaru!) although our car was totaled. The police never did a SINGLE FUCKING THING to investigate this, even though it turned out the driver had a long-expired license and registration and no insurance (and multiple DWIs on her record). My friend and I even got the accident report (which included the driver's address) and went to her house where we saw the Lincoln in the driveway with the smashed-up front end. We reported this to the police and they were like "oh well".

This was more than 30 years ago, so it's nice to know nothing has fucking changed there.

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I literally moved away from albuquerque because the drivers are so bad lol. I saw people run red lights directly in front of APD and the cops did nothing on two separate occasions.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I remember taking my car for an emissions inspection in Albuquerque years ago. The mechanic fiddled around for about half an hour trying to get it to pass and then finally stuck the sensor up the tailpipe of his own car. Service with a smile lol.

[–] PedestrianError@towns.gay 10 points 1 day ago

@DwZ Bicycling safety instructors, who wear helmets and meticulously follow all the rules, are dropping like flies at the hands of motorists, but other cities (@BmoreCityDOT) put out press releases claiming they/their partners in disinformation and inaction are meaningfully addressing bike safety by handing out helmets and platitudes.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The fact that it seems legal to hit someone there at a flashing yellow is wild, even if it's somehow not a crosswalk. Where I live, hitting anyone, including jaywalking pedestrians in dim light wearing all black, is illegal and can get you at least manslaughter.

Then again, I'm pretty sure people still get off... especially if they hit a bicyclist. The technicality they use is calling it a vehicle, and hitting a vehicle isn't illegal even if it kills someone. My cousin got hit biking on the sidewalk in the wrong direction and wasn't able to sue for hospital bill, though that's always an incredibly unsafe thing to do at speed.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

You are totally right, but it's so crazy that you need to argue that killing people should be illegal.

load more comments
view more: next ›