this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
60 points (100.0% liked)

movies

1385 readers
206 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Established in 2013

This should be the only relevant information to decide the case

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh look, Apple trying to bully a smaller company for using a generic term again just because they use that same generic term.

Apple was not in the movie making business when this theater chain was established ion 2013, and had not made any indications they were going to. Apple TV+ launched in 2019.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apple TV has existed since 2007. A theater chain is not in the movie making business

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Apple TV was a set top box. Similar to their computers, an existing product line.

Apple is going to make the claim that the name Apple Theaters is confusing because Apple now makes content, and people associate those terms that way, not just that they both show content. Simply displaying content isn't really an issue, and a streaming service and an in person movie theater are clearly not the same thing or even competing with each other.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Apple is going to make the claim that the name Apple Theaters is confusing because Apple now makes content

Yeah, no, that's not the claim Apple is "going to make". If you had actually read the article, you'd know that Apple's attorneys have already made the claim. We can just read what they said instead of speculating.

Apple has very strong trademark rights in connection with a wide range of goods and services, including movie distribution, its attorneys said.

Wow what do you know, it's not the claim that you are arguing. So... your argument is about an imaginary situation that isn't actually happening (kinda like a man made of straw 🤔).

They're both movie distributors.

a streaming service and an in person movie theater are clearly not the same thing or even competing with each other

I wonder if you typed this with a straight face. I couldn't read it with one. 😂 Streaming services and movie theaters aren't competing? Have you been to a theater lately? It's a good thing you're not Apple Cinemas' lawyer...

EDIT: LOL you can downvote me but it doesn't change reality

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Importantly, Apple hasn't sold an Apple Cinema Display since 2011.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Learning nothing from their slapfight with Apple Corps.

[–] rauls5@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

I hope they don't fold and fight the bastards

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Apple has the challenge to show that people will confuse the two brands. They can pay for good lawyers, but that's an uphill climb.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the very same Apple Computer which “stole” (using their logic) the name from the Beatles’ Apple Corps

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

Allowing the copyright and trademark of generic words is retarded.