this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
977 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

16143 readers
1125 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I actually tend to treat fucks like the constant C in calculus. Ideally it should cancel out entirely and you should give the minimal amount of fucks in all of your final answers.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 54 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is useful for those trying to convey more precisely the amount of fucks they give.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's mainly limited to the American South.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You’re thinking of the fucks relatives, or also known in scientific circles as The Alabamian Constant (TAC for short).

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is the speed of fucks thus constant?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kirkoman@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Nice try but no proof yet if the fuckery field is irrational.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Oh, there's definitely irrational fucks. I don't see a proof that there's indeed a fuckomorphism between C and F, though.

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Here, I gotchu:

The phrase "you stupid fuck" Implies the existence of irrational fucks.

[–] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Nah, just look at the folks over in HR. Irrational fucks to a person. Though I suppose all that means is that there are some irrational elements in the set, not necessarily that it's isomorphic to the field of complex numbers. So can we diagonalize fuckery somehow...?

[–] don@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

So what’s their opinion on the holy fuck?

[–] radix@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Must be an angel with wings, so they can also have a flying fuck.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’ve never given a flying fuck though, and I’ve never heard anyone else give one either, so I’m not convinced they exist.

[–] MohamedMoney@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago

They are rare and seldom bestowed

[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The holy trinity.

Fucking God Damn, Jesus Fucking Christ and Holy Fuck.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

No idea, but I do see plenty of evil fucks every day on the news.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

What in the fucking fuck?! is a good one, too. Has some real what in tarnation? energy to it.

I also learned that FUCKING GOD!! is my go-to expletive when I spilled some icecream and my daughter (3 at the time) started yelling it in the car.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

'What in the fucking fuck' implies that fucking is an injective function over the field of fucks.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

From this we can infer that there is a complex function homomorphic to fucking 🤔

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There are definitely positive and negative fucks

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

There being absolute fucks doesn't imply positive and negative fucks though.

It implies we've set a point to measure against which we call zero fucks.

Perhaps there's an absolute zero fucks which can never be reached.

[–] Entitle9294@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ok, everyone but me seems to get it, so I'll ask. I get everything but the last bit. What does "isomorphic with the complex field" mean? I think I know what isomorphic means from some dabbling I've done in category theory.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

In means you can map every element bijectively to one from the complex field AND addition and multiplication can be performed in either field without leading to contractions, i.e. a+b=c <=> f(a)+f(b)=f(a+b)=f(c) and equivalent for multiplication. This is the part that the meme fails to consider, because nowhere is addition or multiplication for this novel field defined.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago

"i do not give a single fuck" implies an additive identity fuck, and "I don't give two fucks" implies a multiplicative identity fuck. That's a start at least!

[–] Entitle9294@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'll give this some attention when time permits because this does not make things clearer, lol.

I'll start with what a field is and a complex field 🤞

[–] DisguisedJoker@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

ELI5: it means that for every number there's a matching fuck and vice versa.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 3 points 4 days ago

Not only for any number of fucks there is a corresponding complex number, but the basic operations (+, -, x, /) work in the same way for fucks and complex numbers

Overall, if two things are isomorphic you can consider them «  the same »

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 19 points 5 days ago

This does not even scratch the surface of the possible uses and variations of fuck.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 days ago

∅ = how many i have left to give.

[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No prove of irrational fucks yet tho

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of empirical evidence around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

fan-fucking-tastic

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Would plain old "What the Fuck" imply a null set?

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago

I fucking love this

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

fucking fucks implies fucks are procreating.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

What the fuck

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago

Or at least they’re trying…

[–] sunoc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

Okay but is the fuck a monoid in the category of endofunctors ?

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

The fuck transcends our ability to capture its essence

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 days ago

I’ve always loved ladies who are smarter / better educated than me.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Euler's fuck formula.

Perspective changes the reality around it.

[–] Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fucks can also have a social hierarchy, as evidenced by the phrase:

"I don't give a single solitary fuck"

[–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 2 points 4 days ago

These are are simply unitary fucks. Matrix fucks with eigenvalue absolute value of 1. Surprisingly useful for quantum computing applications.

[–] CucumberFetish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The real question is - is fuck Turing-complete?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It's actually a beautiful language for arguing about computability because of how similar it is to a theoretical turning machine in that it possesses a read/write head that can move left and right on an infinite band. It's also incredibly simple to simulate using any other language of choice, including assembly and heck, even raw logic gates.

In this essay I will explain why Brainfuck should be the first language taught to computer science majors.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So what's fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck?

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago

About tree fiddy

load more comments
view more: next ›