this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
114 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10227 readers
373 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This title needs some work. This fellow isn't a researcher he's a shill. There is zero research in what he does.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

Economics isn't a science. It's a religion.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago

Fraser Institute strikes again! Traitors to Canada and humanity.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 18 points 23 hours ago

"The inclusion of Ross McKitrick, whose work is widely debunked and who isn't even American, tells you just how hard it is to find researchers who will question the overwhelming scientific consensus on carbon dioxide emissions and climate change," said Simon Donner, a climate scientist at the University of British Columbia and a lead author on the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.

[–] engene@lemmy.ca 5 points 18 hours ago

Let’s clean the air of this filth! Send him to the rest of the garbage he’s supporting.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago
[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I got to the third or fourth paragraph when I thought “what about the wild fires dumb ass”

The report argues "CO2-induced warming appears to be less economically damaging than commonly believed," and "mitigation policies could prove more detrimental than beneficial."

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 18 points 23 hours ago

"economic damage" is a terrible indicator for human suffering.

the researcher is just a corporation in a human suit