this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
242 points (96.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41333 readers
552 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Insane story from New York City.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 24 points 23 hours ago

Cars have caused irreparable damage to our society. And trying to wind it back is such a monumental process.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 13 points 21 hours ago

It's just a way to deny a development which nimby's don't want in their hood

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Us is crazy regarding their parking laws. No wonder nobody is walking or taking a bike.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Lots of cities have turned off parking minimums because of how bad it is, but it's slow going.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 15 hours ago

Solid 80 years of malinvestment, it will take generations to undo the damage.

[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Outside of NYC, most if not all places lack adequate public transportation systems and walkable resources(grocery stores etc.)

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It's truly abysmal

[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 17 points 23 hours ago

Surprise, she’s a republican

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hear it loud folks, cars are more important than people. Sure it's only a few blocks away from the Q line, but that doesn't matter. Where will people have cars?

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

There has to be a way to incentivize tenants to forego cars for a project like this to succeed. I kind of understand the 1:1 ratio thing, because while I agree it's ridiculous to cut housing units for parking spaces, the reality is that if there aren't enough onsite parking sports for a given MDU, you'll just have people clogging up city streets with overflow parking. Perhaps billing the building as carless or something and charging a premium for a parking spot to disincentivize car ownership?

You see this in major cities here in CA like LA or SF, where much housing was built and zoned before the surge in personal car ownership. Street parking is a nightmare, and neighborhoods are filled to the brim with people plopping their cars wherever they can. It has to be coordinated effort between residents and cities to help alleviate the situation. Even neighborhood vertical parking structures would help.

[–] valek879@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Okay so hear me out, public, neighborhood car parks but also a network of car free streets.

Like my neighborhood is surrounded by arterials, what if you had a car park that was free like within 5 blocks. Is it a waste of space that could be used for housing? Yes. But it also moves cars to the periphery and opens up like 25 blocks to be car free neighborhood streets where people can walk, children can play and we have less noise pollution and can easily build community.

We can designate areas of on street parking for disabled people and allow services into the neighborhood but we could limit the entrances and have more clutter and places to sit and vibe instead of having to maintain vigilance.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago

I honestly believe that's absolutely the direction we should start moving in. It's just going to be a tough sell on divorcing people from there cars, and hopefully an "if you build it they will come" approach works out.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure. Walk a few blocks, take the q, walk another couple blocks, get groceries, walk back to the q, walk another few blocks after, and yay, grocery shopping done for a few days. Only took 4 hours and cramping hands. Hope you're healthy and young enough.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

The only reason being young is a requirement is because of the lack of walkable cities in the US making people there semi sedentary

[–] letraset@feddit.dk 11 points 1 day ago

"But where will my car live?"

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

There is a fair amount of street parking and a bus stop right there...

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

They don't want people living on the streets, but they don't want homeless cars even more.

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

During Tuesday’s City Council Land Use hearing, Vernikov signaled her support for the revised rezoning proposal at 2501 Coney Island Ave. — one that will allow only four stories comprising 27 units and 35 parking spaces, down from the original proposal of 11 stories with 60 units and 24 parking spaces.

Car-brains aside, this smells like corruption. 7 floors with an avg of 5 apartments per floor amount to only 2 parking spots per floor? Wtf are they parking in those spots? Something doesn't add up. Over here we had the reverse problem: greedy developers signed for plans with x apts and y parking spots, only to convert the lower floor garages into extra minuscule apts after construction started.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Speaking of Coney Island and corruption, there's a shitty developer trying to bulldoze the heart of Coney Island (the amusement park, museum, theater, etc) to build a shitty casino. Literally no one in the community wants this and we've been fighting back, but the city doesn't care about what the locals want. Eric Adams has a hand in all this, to no one's surprise.

The shitty developer (Thor Equities) has a history of buying and destroying historic buildings in the area, and has been caught red handed bussing in out-of-townera to feign support

Coney is my performance home so I'm trying to raise awareness