this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
123 points (99.2% liked)

World News

48866 readers
2073 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 55 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

At least, that's what we assume the report says.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I assume the article covers that.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Probably confirms my preconceived expectations.

[–] ominouslemon@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The title is kind of genius.

BTW I don't see this as an actual issue. The important factor is which people read them. If it's journalist who then report on them, and politicians who then act, then they are still effective. I don't see why any average citizen should want to go and read them directly

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 1 points 30 minutes ago

Vijay Prashad:

Such texts are boring not because of their content but because of how they are written. The style of these texts is almost intended to prevent the reader from getting anything out of them. It’s believed that just by publishing these manuals and reports they meet a certain standard of democracy. But what this kind of writing does is to turn people away from reading. Such writing is, therefore, antidemocratic.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] FRYD@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The UN is struggling financially and this report makes the claim that there’s too many meetings and reports that no one reads. They said their most popular reports get 5000 downloads and 1 in 6 reports gets less than 1000 downloads.

[–] Sonor@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

So far i have contributed to that with my own 0

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

UN something, something…

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Thought this would be NotTheOnion

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 11 hours ago

I’ll wait for the movie