Throughout history society has collapsed over and over again either by mismanagement or by overthrow of the ruling class. It's a natural cycle that we seem to be moving away from- Revolt has been mischaracterized and criminalized in an attempt to maintain the status quo. But things weren't always like this. edit: I'm not advocating for anything, just stating some observations
History
Welcome to History!
A community dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.
Rules:
-
Post about history. Ask a question about the past, share a link to an article about something historical, or talk about something related to history that interests you. Discussion is encouraged.
-
No memes. No ads. No promos. No spam.
-
No porn.
-
We like facts and reliable sources here. While sources like Quora/Reddit/Wikipedia can be great tools for quick searches, we do not allow such user-generated content as primary source. What’s wrong with Wikipedia?
NOTE: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban.
Years ago - I believe in one of Dostoyevsky's novels, but I haven't been able to run it down - I read a wonderful allegory on this topic.
The basic gist of it, told nowhere near as well as it was originally:
Once upon a time, there was a peaceful village of farmers. They went through their days, tending their fields and caring for their livestock and each other and simply living.
Every few years though, a group of bandits would ride down out of the nearby hills and attack tge village and take all they could carry of the farmers' crops and livestock.
Then one year, an entirely different group of bandits rode down from a different part of the hills, and they attacked the village and took everything.
So when, a few months later, the customary bandits rode down to attack, they found the village already devastated and everything they would've stolen already gone.
The bandits knew they couldn't allow that - they depended on their theft of the villagers' goods for their own livelihood. So they went back to their camp and, over a hard winter, thought about what to do.
The next spring - long before the harvest, so long before their customary attack on the villagers, they rode down and they approached the village elders with a proposal.
Instead of attacking the villagers and taking everything, they would settle for just taking half of everything, and in exchange they would protect the villagers from being attacked by those other bandits and having everything taken.
And the villagers, with no other hope - being allowed to keep hslf of the fruits of their labors was at least better than losing everything - grudgingly agreed.
And thus was government born.
The impulse to follow big strong loud dangerous people is baked into the our tribal psyche since before we were homo sapiens
The bandits never had to come from outside, they were already the tribal ruling class
The idea of 'a peaceful village of farmers just growing stuff' is a very bad shorthand for how complex the tapestry of human culture has been
The first agriculture workers were likely captured slaves
So it's more accurate to say: A bunch of bandits kidnapped other people and forced them to tend land, leaving the bandits the time and resources to get better at kidnapping, over time the slaves started becoming ambivalent and eventually respecting and in some cases worshiping the bandits that had kidnapped their grandparents, after enough generations are born under the yoke of servitude, it becomes just daily life
Changing the title of the article isn't helpful
~~Definitely a better fit for
!Repurposed_Headlines@lemm.ee ~~
Edit: nevermind, its a quote from the author, not a creative reinterpretation by OP.