United Kingdom

5216 readers

252 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Palestine Action ban coupled with Online Safety Act ‘a threat to public debate’ (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 23 hours ago by Mrkawfee@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's already happened on reddit, various Gaza subreddits are age gated. Anything NSFW is age gated, not just porn but things from Alcoholic Anonymous to chairs Not Fully Submerged in Water on r/chairsunderwater. XBox Live is age gated, because apparently this wasn't about preventing kids from seeing porn like they originally said but it's now about preventing children from talking to adults.

However I don't think it's to do with Palestine Action specifically. That's a separate thing, where an organisation that posed a not-insignificant military threat was dealt with in a clunky way using terrorism laws (which cover threats to civilians). I don't consider those in charge to be clever enough to set all that up in that way; rather, they'd already planned to use the Online Safety Act in this way and would have blocked anything they deemed controversial regardless.

[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Depressing to see mass censorship yet again being dressed up as "protecting kids". Regarding Palestine Action those in charge were heavily lobbied by organizations such as "We Believe in Israel" and other Zionist groups to use terror legislation on non violent protestors that are an inconvenience to the war machine.

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm more concerned that Palestine Action may have itself been lobbied or infiltrated by Russian assets, as many of their actions have seemed to do little to affect Israel's war but instead hinder Ukraine.

[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

That's silly. You could at least parrot the official Zionist propaganda that they're being funded by Iran.