Lack of ranked choice voting. First past the post means we will always be voting for the “lesser of two evils”.
AskUSA
About
Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:
- !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here
Rules
- Be nice or gtfo
- Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
- Follow the rules of discuss.online
Sister communities
Related communities
- !asklemmy@lemmy.world
- !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
- !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
- !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
- !usa@ponder.cat
Ranked choice would also address the whole treating a party as a team sport and other stupid reasons that don't anything to do with which party currently matches what they want.
You'd need to vote for proportional representation first. First-past-the-post creates 2 extremely strong parties, and all other parties have a very hard time being perceived as a viable choice that makes a chance.
Not only that, but FPTP mathematically will always pull the two parties to the center, a hair's breadth apart from one another, because anyone who wanders off into "their" territory will start to lose elections because of it.
I mean... well, that's how it works mathematically. It's not even really applicable to modern US politics. What's happening in modern US politics is that:
- The voters are so addled by propaganda that they can't even really tell what's going on, and mostly make decisions based on pure engineered fantasy instead of based on anything that's actually happening ("Immigration is a problem! Trump is going to fix that problem!" and similar beliefs)
- Even through the fog of propaganda, there are some things that they're able to figure out (health insurance companies are a massive problem and we shouldn't let billionaires keep all of our work output while we're struggling to pay rent and buy eggs). But, the people in Washington by and large don't support fixing any of those things, because the people who pay their bills don't agree with the obvious solutions that 85% of the people would support.
- Party machinery and media monopolization (and now, social media propaganda) prevent anyone who's invested in those popular things -- the "center" that FPTP math would normally be pulling the politicians towards -- from gaining any traction or being able to put anything better than a cruel caricature of it into practice (see also the ACA).
Basically, we fucked. But, if we someone managed to unfuck those massive problems, then we'd still be faced with FPTP pulling everyone to "the center." But, on the other hand, "the center" would be way better than the current American system of one conservative party running against one openly fascist party and like 5-10 rabble-rousers on the left running around Washington and making noise about how really in a perfect world it shouldn't be like that.
My thoughts exactly.
That's not really a fitting xkcd comic. I mean, I am sure there should be one, but one about hardware standards competing is not at all the same as adding a third political party.
It's not a good analogy, though. The goal is not to standardize on one political party.
Third? There are far more than 2 parties.