A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Do you expect them to prosecute themselves? I don't even know what to say. I'm not shy of using strong language, but in this case I can't: my English is far from good enough to describe the intellectual profile of the people who expect Israel to prosecute their soldiers.
Do you expect them to prosecute themselves?
That is sort of how it’s supposed to work, yes. That’s how it’s supposed to work in any organisation.
A person doing a bad thing that gets reported should be investigated internally. They should take appropriate action based upon that investigation. The investigator(s) should be looking to protect the organisation by rooting out the bad apples.
Unfortunately, when too much of the barrel is bad the bad apples protect each other instead of the organisation.
In this case, so much of the organisation is bad that protecting the organisation requires that the bad apples be protected and shit gets covered up.
I still hear my government (Germany) making that trope when asked about yet another attrocity committed by Israeli forces or paramilitary forces.
Pretending Israel to be a functioning state of law is instrumental to pretending these actions are not systematic and done with full support and order by the government.
That is sort of how it’s supposed to work, yes.
It never worked this way. Ever heard about a thief who punished himself? Or a corrupted politician who closed himself in prison?
You're talking about some fairy-land stories with rainbow ponies where there is no evil anyway.
You're talking about some fairy-land stories with rainbow ponies where there is no evil anyway.
I realise that what I’m talking about isn’t working in the IDF but your analogies are not right.
The military isn’t one person who’s turning themself in. It’s an organisation of many people so nobody would be punishing themselves.
It’s like a cashier being caught stealing from the cash drawer. They don’t punish themselves, their employer punishes them and possibly reports them to the police for further punishment.
That’s how it’s supposed to work but isn’t in this case because the whole military is on the same page.
Still you want a thief guild to punish a thief for stealing.
What is happening is happening because it was a governmental requirement. Not some crazy soldiers decided to shoot civilians for their own amusement and by their own will.
It's fucking goddamn motherfucking horse shit! Goddamns monsters.
Honestly, i'm kinda amazed that 12% weren't closed without charges. I wonder if anyone actually got punished or if they were charged but waived.
The 12% were charged for the war crimes not being severe enough.
Punishment is to shoot more civilians