this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
176 points (96.8% liked)

politics

25045 readers
1782 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

Soon he will be locked in a room with a phone that doesn't call out. Just like what he did to his dad.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 54 points 23 hours ago

What NOW, TheHill? Motherfuckers, this rapist has been off the charts gibbering for YEARS. You could have called this out before the election. You could have thrown everything you have into stopping this obvious descent into chaos and fascism.

And now you have the balls to sit there and be like “wow he’s fucked in the head, gee what should we do”?!

FFS GTFO TheHill.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Whatever dementia issues Joe Biden may have, there is no denying that his staff was superb at managing them and protecting both Biden and the country.

WTF? Statements like this undermine credibility. Biden was a President with dementia, and that should not have been allowed to happen. The Democrats struggling to cover up what everyone could see is part of what allowed Trump to return. Trump is also suffering dementia, and should not be allowed to continue in the job either. And it has happened before with Reagan. For a good chunk of my lifetime the USA has been led by old men with failing minds.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Reagan was diagnosed with Alzheimer's a few years after leaving office, but his son said the symptoms were there in 84, before he started his second term.

It's like a time honored tradition around here

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah. Past presidents have done a much better job of hiding it but many (most?) experts believe reagan was pretty out of it by the middle of his second term, if not sooner. And I've seen a few deep dives that argue similar for bush jr but that gets into the other problem.

Our geritocracy mostly predate the modern internet and 24/7 news cycle (which is arguably why both parties are so focused on the olds). So you have people like Biden and dubyah who both have a VERY long history of speech impediments and "word salad" that predated their infirmity because people did not care back in the 80s and 90s and even 00s. But also... it masked said infirmity. Again, I've seen deep dives that make claims as to when Biden went senile but that is the same "body language" analysis that the vast majority of the audience has no way to assess the claims of.

I guess, my view is that we aren't electing a single person to lead the country. That is just completely unreasonable due to the wide breadth of knowledge that would be required. What we are electing is someone charismatic with good judgment who knows how to surround themselves with experts in all the required fields. So if that person becomes unable to fulfill their duty... it theoretically doesn't matter.

That said, it would also be REALLY fucking nice to have someone who isn't drooling while staring into the corner in office.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, but to me I just wish we could have the branches do their actual jobs. The president shouldn't be doing anything but executing legislation that's previously written. I don't think they should be pushing for new legislation, concluding what old legislation means, or pushing any agenda, they should be/ are a glorified cop when it comes to the internal aspects of our country. International relations are another subject. We have 535 people making legislation. 1 person shouldn't ever have say over them, as they are our individualized representatives designated for their purposes, and are a completely different branch of government. When the president says, I don't think this legislation means that, the courts can take a look at it, but they shouldn't be doing that either. It should go back to the legislature, and they should say no actions can be performed until we tell you how high to jump bitch. Now sit and stay or we'll throw you out of that office and charge you with treason.

They are public servants

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think the President SHOULD be arguing/advocating for legislature AS a representative of The People. I don't like that the POTUS is often the face of their political party (that is the Speaker Of The House/Word for Minority Leader) but it is also a consequence of a two party system (which is the end state of most representative Democracies but...).

But it should be done through talking/pressuring politicians and exercising vetoes. Not through kingly decrees under the guise of "I guess we are at war with fentanyl?"

But I acknowledge I grew up with The West Wing (and fully believe Veep is a much more realistic portrayal of government) so I still have an idealized view of what a leader SHOULD do.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

If the Presidents stayed in their roles, the people would follow their congressmembers/senators if they thought things werent how they liked. It wouldn't be a giant publicity show, because you'd have 435 people with a vote that's equal, and 100 in the other house. Making 270 people popular is much harder, and when they can't count for more than everyone else, their standing doesn't "demand" as much respect.

Right now it's the executive branch manipulating the rest, which is rediculous

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago

The symptoms were perfectly obvious when he was in office.

[–] paranoid@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Biden nor trump have been diagnosed with dementia. Mental decline in both of them feels obvious, but suggesting either of them have a diagnosis that they never actually received isn't cool

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

They would never tell you if he was diagnosed. Do you believe he's 220 pounds and a perfect model of health? Like his doctors report says.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 23 hours ago

OK. They have symptoms characteristic of some kinds of dementia. They may not have progressed to the point where the diagnosis is clear, but the symptoms are still a serious concern. Reagan didn't receive his diagnosis until after he left office, but those around him saw clear symptoms starting several years before that.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

Nah, they totally have a diagnosis, its just not public. These are people who were elected to the highest office in the country. They have the best doctors in the world following them around.

[–] gidostro@lemmy.cafe 9 points 1 day ago

It’s a jab about how poorly run his house is, not a defense for Biden.

[–] atticus88th@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The mentally ill leading the mentally ill chosen by the mentally ill. Thats democracy baby!

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 27 points 22 hours ago

The republicans ride it into the ground and take us eith them.

[–] only_in_ohio@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Now Vance will be taking over more and more of the decision-making processes

[–] farting_gorilla@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

I think it'll be Miller who takes more and more control

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

If you aren’t comfortable with labeling this as dementia, that’s fine. But there is no question that the president — the man tasked with making critical life and death decisions for both the country and the world — is struggling with mathematical concepts, has vivid “memories” that are not rooted in reality and has an increasingly foggy grasp of past events that did happen. That’s not a medical diagnosis. These are facts we can see for ourselves and we all know, even those of us who voted for Trump three times, that this can’t be allowed to continue.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 9 points 22 hours ago

What now? There will be nothing whatsoever done about it because Trump has a magical aura around him that makes it impossible to impose consequences for anything

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Wait until he trips walking down the stairs from AF1.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

Hope the fall is in 4k

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Uncle Joe had the right idea:

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Im opting for a 10/22 instead for my first buy i think, shotgun and revolver will follow but not in that order

Im what you call, a classy Fudd. I'd like to plink without bothering the neighbors.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 23 hours ago

Always has been.

[–] AndiHutch@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago

Wow, Trump is truly a man of the people! I too struggle with finding the right words and delusionally believe everything I make up as the absolute truth too. Just the other day I raised the rent 10,000% on my tenants. Trump is just like me. /s