this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
207 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25045 readers
2070 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Department of Homeland Security memo obtained by TNR signals top-level discussions about a potential escalation of the Pentagon’s domestic anti-immigration role, and lays out new details.

Archived copies of the article:

The memo itself is published here with archived copies at:

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Having read the memo--which is basically meeting minutes between the DoD and DHS-- it's seems to be missing an understanding of how much Trump is disliked up and down the ranks. They ultimately did almost nothing in LA. The birthday military parade had clear signs of everyone phoning it in on purpose. Signalgate convinced all but the most diehard MAGA soldiers (not as big a group as you might think) that this leadership is a bunch of clowns.

What this means is that the White House still overestimates how much the military is in their pocket. Good.

From Ur-fascism:

Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

What's missing from the analysis is that they can't objectively evaluate their own forces, either. As much as they go on about strength and fighting and war, they're actually really bad at it.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 19 points 23 hours ago

What this means is that the White House still overestimates how much the military is in their pocket

When their enemy is civilians, they only need a few willing soldiers. China ordered several army units to use deadly force against protesters in Tiananmen Square. Several generals denied the order. Whole squads threw their wepons into the river and deserted. The Square was still covered in the blood of thousands. A few loyal soliders in tanks is all that's needed. The generals and soldiers who denied the order were court maritaled.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

He's never had to fight harder than it takes to throw a plate of spaghetti at the wall.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The fuck trump shuffle was funny to hear about. The logistical failures in LA and Afghanistan are great signs of poor strategy and basic understanding of.. Any military not just the US.

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...and then they came for me

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Right now everyone needs to be fighting for the rights of immigrants and trans people, because those people are simply on the front lines of a battle that's coming for you if they fall. This is how we need to think of the fight for human rights. It's not a series of separate fights for this group's rights or that group's; it's an ongoing battle for all of us, whose front lines are always shifting as the enemy spots opportunities.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

As a trans woman fucking help us, this is a situation where you really are with us or against us. If you side with us then you show you give a shit about your own rights too. If you are against us (or are ambivalent about it) then you are casting all of our rights aside because of some culture war bullshit.

You will be next, so fucking act now or forever wish you choose to act.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

Exactly. This is something everyone needs to care about. If you want to stand up for humanity, fight for trans rights.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

Why wouldn’t it? Everyone’s sat by and happily taken it so far.

[–] tedd_deireadh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Fascists need an enemy, and when they've exhausted all external threats they'll turn to their own citizenry.

YOU should ask how DoD is planning to more effectively support DHS during the next instance of “L.A.-type” operations.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is what happens when you let the weird uncles rule your country.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a weird uncle, I have to inform you that most of us don't want to rule a country. We want to teach the kids to sing the diarrhea song.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, I should have specified the weird racist conservative kind, not the weird, friendly but quirky kind of uncle.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago
[–] peregrin5@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

chat gpt how to make Molotov cocktail

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Just get the anarchists cookbook like the rest of us

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Chat gpt summarize the anarchists cookbook into a mouth full paragraph.