this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
139 points (99.3% liked)

World News

48823 readers
2427 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pro-Palestine protesters will be legally protected while marching across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday after a New South Wales supreme court decision.

The bridge is expected to be closed for about five hours, from 11.30am, and additional police are being mobilised to observe a march that could include up to 50,000 people.

In her judgment, Justice Belinda Rigg said “the march at this location is motivated by the belief that the horror and urgency of the situation in Gaza demands an urgent and extraordinary response from the people of the world”.

“The evidence indicates there is significant support for the march.”

50,000 seems a bit on the small side for a Sydney Harbour Bridge march. Hopefully there will be many many more than that.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Considering the awful weather right now, the conformist sort of culture, and that a lot of people can't attend marches I'm already impressed they're expecting 50k on the bridge.

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

Moved to Adelaide. Didn't know Sydney weather has crapped it's pants again.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 4 points 9 hours ago

...good on yer, mates!... ...with you in spirit...

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

A massive match on a bridge sounds unsafe because of resonance, but since OP says it's on the smaller side, it's probably ok.

Is it even true that resonance can collapse bridges??

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

I didn't know about resonance either, that's interesting. It would take a lot though, it's an eight lane wide bridge+ trains in both directions+ pedestrian walkways on both sides.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Resonance on a bridge is only able to become an issue if you have everybody actually marching in step (and it's worth noting that these days they make sure bridges can handle way more than they're expected to). Getting a crowd of protesters on a bridge walking together is just gonna have the weight of the protesters.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

It was true, which is why they used to march out of step. It's not a problem for protest matches that are not in time.

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 8 points 9 hours ago

This bridge had a march with 300,000 to 500,000 back into 2000. Huge bridge. Can handle a lot.

[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

It's only true of badly designed bridges, these days. Modern engineering tools can calculate the resonant frequencies, and they make certain that those are far away from the frequencies which humans or wind can create