this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
68 points (90.5% liked)

Dank Memes

7282 readers
348 users here now

This is the place to be on the interweb when Reddit irreversibly becomes a meme itself and implodes

If you are existing mods from r/dankmemes, you should be mod here too, kindly DM me on either platform

The many rules inherited from

  1. Be nice, don't be not nice
  2. No Bigotry or Bullying
  3. Don't be a dick!
  4. Censor any and all personal information from posts and comments
  5. No spam, outside links, or videos.
  6. No Metabaiting
  7. No brigading
  8. Keep it dank!
  9. Mark NSFW and spoilers appropriately
  10. NO REEEEEEE-POSTS!
  11. No shitposting
  12. Format your meme correctly. No posts where the title is the meme caption!
  13. No agenda posting!
  14. Don't be a critic
  15. Karma threshold? What's that?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I know someone that didn't realize they were red/green colorblind until they were a teenager.

[–] acidrobot@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

This is an interesting book about growing up with color blindness https://a.co/d/hVKjvDd.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Talking about colour blindness is a bit misleading as tried colour blindness is very rare but having a red-green colour deficiency is quite normal, men having some 14.5% prevalence. (Women only like less than a percent)

I have diagnosable deficiency, but it really doesn't come up in real life unless there's like a really deep metallic colored car which might be harder to correctly identify or cause a bit of debate.

Like you wouldn't call someone blind because they can't read subtitles from a somewhat faraway TV without glasses. You'd just say they don't have the greatest vision.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

I mean they literally do. How do I know your colors are the same as mine?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I only knew in my university medical checkup. I'd always wondered why there was a strip of white on color wheels, so that explained that. Turns out that's just cyan.

[–] wolfrasin@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago

Cyan is fake! So is pink

[–] dxc@sh.itjust.works 17 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Have been working with two red-green blind people for some years. They told me they didn't know for the longest time. One of them became an electrician, the other one was disqualified since he couldn't differentiate between red and green. That's how he found out. The electrician guy found out years later once he questioned why his colleagues get the different coloured wires right all the time but he didn't. Both of them see red and green in different grey shades, they told me something like blacker greys are red and whiter greys are green.

[–] GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ha! I had an electrical engineer friend with a similar story. He thought manufacturers were idiots for colour coding their cables with shades that are so close to each other.

I think he'd been in the industry for about 5 years when he found out...

[–] dxc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

That's hilarious I love it. My prior coworkers were so confused by pink & lime green and those sorts of similar shades.

[–] brokenlcd@feddit.it 2 points 14 hours ago

I had wired Ethernet in my whole house. Feeling like a complete dunce at having to give 3 tries for each termination. Before realizing two years later that i was red-green colorblind.

After that diagnosis i felt so fucking validated.

[–] capcool@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

You got my meme bro.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 25 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

What if what my brain interprets as green yours interprets as hot purple?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 5 points 15 hours ago

I think this is exactly what is called qualia, what you see may be different from what I see, and there's no way to ever tell.

As a kid, I thought colour blindness/deficiency worked like that, until I learned that in this case people have trouble distinguishing colours, not naming them

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

if your whole life salads looked like that they wouldn't be weird at all.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I get that it's a joke, but bottom line? The names of colors are just the way our brains interpret specific wavelengths, and wavelength is objective. So it doesn't really matter, because the wavelength of the photon is the same regardless of how our brain perceives it

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wavelength may be objective, but the signal that a brain receives may be different if the cells which are supposed to receive that objective wavelength aren't functioning correctly.

Like if I make you wear rose coloured glasses, it doesn't matter what colours I show you, you won't be able to name them correctly because the objective stimulus is literally coloured before it makes it to your brain.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Except the rose-colored glasses example doesn't really disagree, because the colored glass is absorbing all the photons except the pink ones, so you're really just further making my point.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

But that's correlation, the way the brain conceptualizes it into a "color" in the mental model, well that's the qualia stuff referenced in another comment.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago

That's what I've been doing. It might not be ideal but it works more times than it doesn't.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 5 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

...here's one for ya, purple doesn't appear in any specturm or in nature, it a a complete creation of man mixing blue and red together...

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago

There are purple flowers? How is that not in nature.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

That's kinda up for debate. Most people casually consider violet to be purple, and the distinction of it being a non-spectral color is a (fairly contentious) academic one.

Now pink, on the other hand, that's an unholy creation not of earth....

[–] PleaseLetMeOut@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Violet's wavelength is singular, and near the edge of the visible spectrum while purple has 2 peaks and is in the middle, as mix of red and blue (as stated). Think harmonics but with light.

They are very much different colors. The shade/hue/etc. are all different values. 4F2F4F vs 800080.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And yet if you tell someone to go get the purple flower over there, they will not be at all confused and know exactly what you're talking g about. They may be technically different colours, but practically they are interchangeable.

[–] PleaseLetMeOut@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I get that, during casual conversation etc. But what if there's a bunch of violet and purple flowers and they pick a violet one? The distinction can matter and knowing it can be useful. You can't use other people's ignorance as an excuse.

Even crayon companies make both for a reason JS :P

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

But what if there's a bunch of violet and purple flowers

If you only provide the color, regardless which one, there would be a high risk of them choosing the wrong because they are so visually similar. so you would of course provide further physical description that would help distinguish the correct flower.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

pink dolphins? Salmon? pink flowers?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

This is a comment on the fascinatingly complex semantic argument surrounding non-spectral colors, not that "pink things" themselves don't exist.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

forgive me i still need coffee

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

I'll spare you, but only if you share some coffee. Someone appears to have snuck in and drank all of mine...

[–] notsure@fedia.io 1 points 18 hours ago

...and that's why carnatians are the flower of death...heehehehehh.../s

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Purple flowers definitely exist though?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Not being spectral means it's not a single colour, it's always a mix of colours

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So lots of colours are a mix of colours. That is kind of the point.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 11 hours ago

Yes, but also a bit of no. Some mixes produce the colour that is exactly the same as you would produce bulky a single colour. Statistically I would guess that most don't, but I am not sure and failed to find such a statistics on the internet

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

Orange doesn't exist.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

some do, and some don't! this is definitely a thing that happens, finding out your color blind as an adult. most often when people try to so things like get pilots licenses etc

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

yes, they do find out when they are young. in many countries they get tested even. most just can't see the difference of two colors, eg red and green. usually traffic lights are in a certain order, so it works for them.

we will never know if red looks green to them or green looks red to them. they still can see it's not grey.