this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

Public Health

969 readers
8 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

People who consume the artificial sweetener sucralose are less likely to respond to cancer immunotherapy, suggesting the sweetener may blunt the treatment’s effects.

Immunotherapy helps the immune system detect and destroy cancer cells, making it a crucial treatment for numerous cancers. “When it works, it works very well. Patients can be disease free and go about their lives and live for years and years,” says Abigail Overacre-Delgoffe at the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania. “Unfortunately, immunotherapy doesn’t work for all patients, and in many cancer types, it only works for the minority of patients.”

It isn’t clear why that is, though numerous studies indicate the gut microbiome plays a role, as it helps regulate immune responses. Previous research has also shown that artificial sweeteners can change the composition of gut microbes in humans.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pablopablavich@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

Just in case anyone was curious, Sucralose was the main artificial sweetener mentioned but they also found acesulfame K, to have similar effects.