this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

319 readers
447 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

  1. No paywalled sites at all.
  2. News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
  3. No videos.
  4. Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.

Encouraged:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Thousands of South Dakotans have been publicly labeled as applicants for government assistance and thousands more have had their email address and phone number exposed, due to a new state law and the way the state’s election office is implementing it.

Although the legislation creating the law received some Democratic votes, it’s a product of the Republican-dominated Legislature. Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden signed it into law and Republican Secretary of State Monae Johnson is carrying out its provisions.

Several legislators, both Democrats and Republicans, are now telling South Dakota Searchlight they did not intend for the law to expose sensitive information — especially the identity of public assistance applicants.

“This is what happens when you put the wrong people in charge,” said state House Minority Leader Erin Healy, D-Sioux Falls, who voted against the bill. “We talk a lot about freedom and privacy in this state, so it’s a shame that this legislation led to this type of breach.”

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The South Dakota Democratic Party regularly purchased the information in the past. Executive Director Dan Ahlers, a former legislator, said past spreadsheets did not identify voters as having registered while applying for public assistance.

Former secretary of state and current Public Utilities Commissioner Chris Nelson, a Republican, said lists compiled by his staff while he was secretary of state from 2003 through 2010 did not disclose how voters registered.

Yeah, the public one listing more data than the purchased one is deilfintey not just making the same thing publicly available. What a shitshow.